Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640581›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Intraosseous Venous Malformation of the Zygomatic Bone: Comparison between Virtual Surgical Planning and Standard Surgery with Review of the Literature.

Raúl Antúnez-Conde, Carlos Navarro Cuéllar, José Ignacio Salmerón Escobar, Alberto Díez-Montiel, Ignacio Navarro Cuéllar, Giovanni Dell'Aversana Orabona, José Luis Del Castillo Pardo de Vera, Carlos Navarro Vila, José Luis Cebrián Carretero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raúl Antúnez-CondeMaxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Navarro CuéllarMaxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
José Ignacio Salmerón EscobarMaxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
Alberto Díez-MontielMaxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio Navarro CuéllarMaxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
Giovanni Dell'Aversana OrabonaMaxillofacial Surgery Department, Università "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
José Luis Del Castillo Pardo de VeraMaxilofacial Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Navarro VilaMaxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
José Luis Cebrián CarreteroMaxilofacial Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraosseous venous malformations affecting the zygomatic bone are infrequent. Primary reconstruction is usually accomplished with calvarial grafts, although the use of virtual surgical planning, cutting guides and patient-specific implants (PSI) have had a major development in recent years. A retrospective study was designed and implemented in patients diagnosed with intraosseous venous malformation during 2006-2021, and a review of the scientific literature was also performed to clarify diagnostic terms. Eight patients were treated, differentiating two groups according to the technique: four patients were treated through standard surgery with resection and primary reconstruction of the defect with calvarial graft, and four patients underwent resection and primary reconstruction through virtual surgical planning (VSP), cutting guides, STL models developed with CAD-CAM technology and PSI (titanium or Polyether-ether-ketone). In the group treated with standard surgery, 75% of the patients developed sequelae or morbidity associated with this technique. The operation time ranged from 175 min to 210 min (average 188.7 min), the length of hospital ranged from 4 days to 6 days (average 4.75 days) and the postoperative CT scan showed a defect surface coverage of 79.75%. The aesthetic results were "excellent" in 25% of the patients, "good" in 50% and "poor" in 25%. In the VSP group, 25% presented sequelae associated with surgical treatment. The operation time ranged from 99 min to 143 min (average 121 min), the length of hospital stay ranged from 1 to 2 days (average of 1.75 days) and 75% of the patients reported "excellent" results. Postoperative CT scan showed 100% coverage of the defect surface in the VSP group. The multi-stage implementation of virtual surgical planning with cutting guides, STL models and patient-specific implants increases the reconstructive accuracy in the treatment of patients diagnosed with intraosseous venous malformation of the zygomatic bone, reducing sequelae, operation time and average hospital stay, providing a better cover of the defect, and improving the precision of the reconstruction and the aesthetic results compared to standard technique.

Indexed as

CAD-CAM technologyhead and neck reconstructionimmunohistochemistrypatient-specific implantstereolithographic modelsvascular anomaliesvirtual surgical planningzygomatic bone

Identifiers

PMID34640581
PMCPMC8509390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.