Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640542›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Challenges Related to Surgical Site Infection Prevention-Results after Standardized Bundle Implementation.

Jonas Jurt, Martin Hübner, Daniel Clerc, Pauline Curchod, Mohamed A Abd El Aziz, Dieter Hahnloser, Laurence Senn, Nicolas Demartines, Fabian Grass

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonas JurtDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Martin HübnerDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-8279
Daniel ClercDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9285-3312
Pauline CurchodDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mohamed A Abd El AzizDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4477-0114
Dieter HahnloserDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laurence SennDepartment of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas DemartinesDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1530-3114
Fabian GrassDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9884-2879
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to assess the implementation of an intraoperative standardized surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundle.

methodsThe multimodal, evidence-based care bundle included nine intraoperative items (antibiotic type, timing, and re-dosing; disinfection; induction temperature control > 36.5°; glove change; intra-cavity lavage; wound protection; and closure strategy). The bundle was applied to all consecutive patients undergoing colonic resections. The primary outcome, SSI, was independently assessed by the National Infection Surveillance Committee for up to 30 postoperative days. A historical, institutional pre-implementation control group (2012-2017) with an identical methodology was used for comparison.

findingsIn total, 1516 patients were included, of which 1256 (82.8%) were in the control group and 260 (17.2%) were in the post-implementation group. After 2:1 propensity score matching, the groups were similar for all items (

conclusionsThe implementation of an intraoperative standardized care bundle had no impact on SSI rates. This may be explained by insufficient compliance with the individual measures.

Indexed as

bundlecolorectalcompliancesurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID34640542
PMCPMC8509330
OpenAlexW3203088797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.