ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
High-Frequency Ultrasound to Assess Activity in Connective Tissue Panniculitis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Doppler Ultrasound Insights: A Multicenter Prospective Study on Healthy Skin.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- High-Frequency and Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound in Dermatologic Diseases and Aesthetic Medicine.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining disease activity from clinical signs in patients with connective tissue panniculitis (CTP) is often challenging but is essential for therapeutic decision making, which largely relies on immunosuppressant treatment. High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) may be useful in supporting such decisions by accurately determining CTP activity. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of HFUS in identifying signs of CTP activity or inactivity and assess its usefulness in therapeutic decision making. A prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with biopsy-proven CTP receiving HFUS was conducted in a tertiary university hospital (2016-2020). HFUS was performed at inclusion and at each 3- or 6-month follow-up visit, depending on disease activity. Twenty-three patients with CTP were included, and 134 HFUSs were performed. In 59.7% (80) of the evaluations, the clinical presentation did not show whether CTP was active or not. In these cases, HFUS showed activity in 38.7% (31) and inactivity in 61.3% (49). In 71.25% (57) of the visits, HFUS was the determinant for therapeutic decisions. Further follow-up showed consistent clinical and HFUS responses in all unclear cases after treatment modification. HFUS appears to be a useful adjunct to the clinical examination for CTP to assess activity and make therapeutic decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.