Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640531›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Postoperative Pain following Root Canal Filling with Bioceramic vs. Traditional Filling Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Elina Mekhdieva, Massimo Del Fabbro, Mario Alovisi, Allegra Comba, Nicola Scotti, Margherita Tumedei, Massimo Carossa, Elio Berutti, Damiano Pasqualini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Bioceramic versus conventional endodontic sealers: An umbrella review.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Bioceramics in Endodontics: Updates and Future Perspectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elina MekhdievaEndodontics and Restorative Dentistry, CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2785-6389
Massimo Del FabbroDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-0984
Mario AlovisiEndodontics and Restorative Dentistry, CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2523-8149
Allegra CombaEndodontics and Restorative Dentistry, CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4057-1428
Nicola ScottiEndodontics and Restorative Dentistry, CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7380-1675
Margherita TumedeiDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8770-5297
Massimo CarossaEndodontics and Restorative Dentistry, CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9495-1832
Elio BeruttiEndodontics and Restorative Dentistry, CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Damiano PasqualiniEndodontics and Restorative Dentistry, CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0365-0626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate postoperative pain (POP) following root canal filling (RCF) with gutta-percha/bioceramic sealer (BCS) vs. gutta-percha/traditional sealer (TS) techniques. Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials. Subgroup analyses were performed for analgesic intake, flare-ups, postoperative time (24/48 h), pulp status, and retreatment. The search yielded 682 records, and nine studies were selected. BCS was associated with significantly lower POP vs. TS at 24 h (

Indexed as

analgesic intakebioceramic sealerflare-upmeta-analysispostoperative painroot canal filling

Identifiers

PMID34640531
PMCPMC8509229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.