Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640486›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Impact on the Mental and Physical Health of the Portuguese Population during the COVID-19 Confinement.

Fátima Frade, Lia Jacobsohn, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Rosário Martins, Regina Allande-Cussó, Carlos Ruiz-Frutos, João Frade

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Fátima FradeEscola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, 1600-190 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6190-5298
Lia JacobsohnEscola Superior de Saúde, Universidade Atlântica, 2730-036 Barcarena, Portugal.
Juan Gómez-SalgadoDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9053-7730
Rosário MartinsEscola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8609-5834
Regina Allande-CussóNursing Department, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-0838
Carlos Ruiz-FrutosDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3715-1382
João FradeInstituto Politécnico de Leiria, Escola Superior de Saúde e Centre for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechcare), 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4947-1052
Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · ECAtlântica Instituto Universitário · PTInstituto Politécnico de Leiria · PTPolytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo · PTUniversidad de Sevilla · ESUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/05704/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDP/05704/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Confinement of the population has been one of the measures implemented by different governments to address the COVID-19 health crisis, and it has led to social isolation together with a disruption of daily activities. The aim of the study is to analyze psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal. During the quarantine, a cross-sectional study was carried out on a sample of 2120 subjects over 18 years of age, resident and born in Portugal. Data were collected using a self-developed questionnaire that considered socio-demographic variables, physical symptoms, health conditions, and history of contact with COVID-19, as well as psychological alterations. The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) was also included. Univariate and bivariate statistical analyses were performed. Predictive capacity was studied using logistic regression models. The results showed a higher percentage of individuals presenting psychological distress (57.2.0%), with a higher percentage identified among women (79.0%), and in people with a higher educational level (bachelor's + master's and doctorate) (75.8%). The predictor variables with the greatest weight were sex, educational level (graduation, master's, and doctorate), living with children or under 16 years of age, presence of symptoms, and quarantine in the last 14 days for having symptoms. Good self-assessment of health and working at home appear to be protective against psychological distress. These results highlight the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological distress and provide an opportunity to consider the need to implement specific multidisciplinary public health and mental health interventions in this pandemic situation.

Indexed as

COVID-19mental healthpandemicpsychological distresspublic healthquarantine

Identifiers

PMID34640486
PMCPMC8509264
OpenAlexW3202821251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.