Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640449›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Using Deep Neural Networks for Predicting Age and Sex in Healthy Adult Chest Radiographs.

Chung-Yi Yang, Yi-Ju Pan, Yen Chou, Chia-Jung Yang, Ching-Chung Kao, Kuan-Chieh Huang, Jing-Shan Chang, Hung-Chieh Chen, Kuei-Hong Kuo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Deep learning-based age estimation from chest CT scans.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chung-Yi YangSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Yi-Ju PanDepartment of Psychiatry, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan.
Yen ChouDivision of Medical Image, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2388-194X
Chia-Jung YangDepartment of Radiology, Taitung MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taitung 95054, Taiwan.
Ching-Chung KaoAI Lab, Quanta Computer Inc., Taoyuan City 33377, Taiwan.
Kuan-Chieh HuangAI Lab, Quanta Computer Inc., Taoyuan City 33377, Taiwan.
Jing-Shan ChangAI Lab, Quanta Computer Inc., Taoyuan City 33377, Taiwan.
Hung-Chieh ChenSchool of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11267, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3544-5045
Kuei-Hong KuoDivision of Medical Image, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWQuanta Computer (Taiwan) · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TWFar Eastern Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe performance of chest radiography-based age and sex prediction has not been well validated. We used a deep learning model to predict the age and sex of healthy adults based on chest radiographs (CXRs).

methodsIn this retrospective study, 66,643 CXRs of 47,060 healthy adults were used for model training and testing. In total, 47,060 individuals (mean age ± standard deviation, 38.7 ± 11.9 years; 22,144 males) were included. By using chronological ages as references, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to assess the model performance. Summarized class activation maps were used to highlight the activated anatomical regions. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to examine the validity for sex prediction.

resultsWhen model predictions were compared with the chronological ages, the MAE was 2.1 years, RMSE was 2.8 years, and Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.97 (

conclusionDeep learning can accurately estimate age and sex based on CXRs.

Indexed as

age predictionchest radiographdeep learningsex prediction

Identifiers

PMID34640449
PMCPMC8509558
OpenAlexW3204111848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.