Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640435›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

XEN Glaucoma Implant for the Management of Glaucoma in Naïve Patients versus Patients with Previous Glaucoma Surgery.

Katarzyna Lewczuk, Joanna Konopińska, Joanna Jabłońska, Jacek Rudowicz, Patrycja Laszewicz, Diana Anna Dmuchowska, Zofia Mariak, Marek Rękas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Factors influencing the long-term-success of the XEN gel stent.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. XEN® implantation: an effective strategy to stop glaucoma progression despite prior minimally invasive glaucoma surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  15. Defining the role of ab externo Xen gel stent in glaucomatous eyes with prior failed surgical intervention.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katarzyna LewczukDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna KonopińskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University in Bialystok, M. Sklodowska-Curie 24A STR, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9088-6938
Joanna JabłońskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2530-4583
Jacek RudowiczDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.
Patrycja LaszewiczDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.
Diana Anna DmuchowskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University in Bialystok, M. Sklodowska-Curie 24A STR, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3548-9139
Zofia MariakDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University in Bialystok, M. Sklodowska-Curie 24A STR, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
Marek RękasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0429-6649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective study analyzed the surgical and refractive outcomes of a XEN Gel Implant (Allergan, Abbvie Company, Irvine, CA, USA) in naïve patients versus those with previous glaucoma surgery. We evaluated the efficacy of XEN implantation in 86 glaucoma patients during a long-term follow-up period. Patients were divided into two groups: naïve patients (Group 1) and patients with previous glaucoma surgery (Group 2). Eyes that received a XEN Gel Stent placement from December 2014 to October 2019 were included. Intraocular pressure (IOP) change, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), change in glaucoma medications, frequency of slit lamp revision procedures, and frequency of secondary glaucoma surgeries were the primary outcomes. In Group 1, the mean IOP before surgery was decreased significantly from 25.00 ± 7.52 mmHg to 16.83 ± 5.12 mmHg by the end of the study. In Group 2, the mean IOP decreased significantly from 25.35 ± 7.81 mmHg to 17.54 ± 5.34 mmHg. The mean IOP decrease from baseline was 29% in Group 1 and 27% in Group 2 (

Indexed as

blebglaucoma surgerymanagementminimally invasive glaucoma surgeryrefractory glaucomaretrospective studysubconjunctival stentXEN implant

Identifiers

PMID34640435
PMCPMC8509378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.