ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021
First-Line Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors for ALK-Positive Lung Cancer in Asian Populations: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the efficacy based on clinicopathological characteristics and the safety of first-line treatments for patients with advanced ALK rearrangement non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Comparing efficacy and safety of upfront treatment strategies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical Evaluation of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on the 2nd Edition of China's Drug Evaluation and Selection Guideline.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Linagliptin-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid: A Case Report and Comprehensive Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
- Ensartinib as a neoadjuvant therapy for stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer patients with EML4-ALK fusion: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Comparative Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors for Treatment-Naïve ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastasis: A Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- An unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with EML4-ALK rearrangement achieving partial response after first-line treatment with ensartinib: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (ALKIs) have been approved for first-line use in treating anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To date, no head-to-head comparison of these newer generation ALKIs has been made, and different efficacies of ALKIs may present across ethnicity. This study aims to compare newer generation ALKIs for treatment efficacy in Asian groups using network meta-analysis. Phase II/III trials that enrolled treatment-naïve Asian ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients treated by ALKIs were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) of each trial were extracted as indicators of drug efficacy. Surfaces under cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were calculated as a numeric presentation of the overall ranking associated with each agent. After a systematic literature review, six phase III clinical trials were included. Our results showed that newer generation ALKIs, such as alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib, and lorlatinib, all demonstrated superior efficacy to crizotinib. Among those, ensartinib exhibited the best overall SUCRA value and ranked first among all agents. According to our network meta-analysis, ensartinib may currently be the most effective first-line treatment for Asian patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. However, this conclusion needs further validation by a larger scale of clinical trials or posthoc analysis of Asian populations. Moreover, in our comparison, low-dose alectinib (300 mg twice daily) exhibited an efficacy profile similar to a higher dose regimen in Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.