ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
The Effect of Selective Retina Therapy with Automatic Real-Time Feedback-Controlled Dosimetry for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Comparing treatment outcomes in randomized controlled trials of central serous chorioretinopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes of titration-guided focal selective retina therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: retrospective real-world data analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic interventions for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a comprehensive assessment of systematic reviews.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Review
- Use of a Fundus Image-Based Titration Strategy for Selective Retina Therapy for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Selective retina therapy with real-time feedback-controlled technology in central serous chorioretinopathy: a 24-month follow-up real-world prospective study.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Randomized controlled trials in central serous chorioretinopathy: A review.Eye (London, England) · 2023Review
- Long-Term Multimodal Imaging Analysis of Selective Retina Therapy Laser Lesions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Factors Predicting Response to Selective Retina Therapy in Patients with Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This prospective randomized controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of real-time feedback-controlled dosimetry (RFD)-guided selective retina therapy (SRT) in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Forty-four participants with chronic CSC were included and randomly assigned to the control group or SRT group. The SRT laser system with RFD-guidance was applied to cover the entire leakage area. If SRF remained at the 6-week follow-up visit, re-treatment and rescue SRT was performed for the SRT group and crossover group, respectively. The rate of complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF), mean SRF height, and mean retinal sensitivity were compared between the two groups at 6-weeks post-treatment. The complete SRF resolution rate in all SRT-treated eyes was evaluated at 12-weeks post-treatment. The rate of complete SRF resolution was significantly higher in the SRT group (63.6%) than in the control group (23.8%) at 6-weeks post-treatment (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.