Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34640255›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Osteosphere Model to Evaluate Cell-Surface Interactions of Implantable Biomaterials.

Ana Carolina Batista Brochado, Victor Hugo de Souza, Joice Correa, Suzana Azevedo Dos Anjos, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão, Angelo Cardarelli, Pietro Montemezzi, Vinicius Schott Gameiro, Mariana Rodrigues Pereira, Elena Mavropoulos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ana Carolina Batista BrochadoPost-Graduation Program in Science & Biotechnology, Institute of Biology, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi 24210-201, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-1609
Victor Hugo de SouzaPost-Graduation Program in Science & Biotechnology, Institute of Biology, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi 24210-201, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9678-5217
Joice CorreaClinical Research Unit, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi 24033-900, Brazil.
Suzana Azevedo Dos AnjosNational Institute for Metrology, Standardization and Metrological Quality, Xerém 25250-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9097-3898
Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros MourãoClinical Research Unit, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi 24033-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5775-0222
Angelo CardarelliDepartment of Dentistry, University Vita Salute San Raffaele, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Pietro MontemezziClinical Research Unit, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi 24033-900, Brazil.
Vinicius Schott GameiroClinical Research Unit, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi 24033-900, Brazil.
Mariana Rodrigues PereiraNeurobiology Department, Institute of Biology, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi 24210-201, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5579-992X
Elena MavropoulosBrazilian Center for Physics Research, Rio de Janeiro 22290-180, Brazil.
Gutemberg Gomes AlvesClinical Research Unit, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi 24033-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0016-4809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful biomaterials for bone tissue therapy must present different biocompatible properties, such as the ability to stimulate the migration and proliferation of osteogenic cells on the implantable surface, to increase attachment and avoid the risks of implant movement after surgery. The present work investigates the applicability of a three-dimensional (3D) model of bone cells (osteospheres) in the evaluation of osteoconductive properties of different implant surfaces. Three different titanium surface treatments were tested: machined (MA), sandblasting and acid etching (BE), and Hydroxyapatite coating by plasma spray (PSHA). The surfaces were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), confirming that they present very distinct roughness. After seeding the osteospheres, cell-surface interactions were studied in relation to cell proliferation, migration, and spreading. The results show that BE surfaces present higher densities of cells, leaving the aggregates towards than titanium surfaces, providing more evidence of migration. The PSHA surface presented the lowest performance in all analyses. The results indicate that the 3D model allows the focal analysis of an in vitro cell/surfaces interaction of cells and surfaces. Moreover, by demonstrating the agreement with the clinical data observed in the literature, they suggest a potential use as a predictive preclinical tool for investigating osteoconductive properties of novel biomaterials for bone therapy.

Indexed as

biocompatibilitybiomaterialsboneosteoconductivitytitaniumtridimensional cell culture

Identifiers

PMID34640255
PMCPMC8510223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.