ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell Viability Assay of Chitosan-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorative Cements.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Improving the Biocompatibility of Plant-Derived Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Using Heat Treatment.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Effect of Surface Treatments Applied to 3D Printed Permanent Resins on Shear Bond Strength.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Enamel Remineralisation with a Novel Sodium Fluoride-Infused Bristle Toothbrush.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Stereomicroscopic Aspects of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effects of Polishing and Artificial Aging on Mechanical Properties of Dental LT ClearJournal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An Experimental Anodized and Low-Pressure Oxygen Plasma-Treated Titanium Dental Implant Surface-Preliminary Report.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Update in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Root Canal Therapy in Temporary Dentition through Different Rotatory Systems: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Fractal Dimension and Texture Analysis in the Assessment of Experimental Laser-Induced Periodic Surface Structures (LIPSS) Dental Implant Surface-In Vitro Study Preliminary Report.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Surface Evaluation of Orthodontic Brackets Using Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cytotoxic Evaluation of the New Composite Resin through an Artificial Pulp Chamber.BioMed research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biocompatibility is defined as "the ability of a biomaterial, prosthesis, or medical device to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific application". Biocompatibility is especially important for restorative dentists as they use materials that remain in close contact with living tissues for a long time. The research material involves six types of cement used frequently in the subgingival region: Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, Germany), Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia) (Glass Ionomer Cements), Breeze (Pentron Clinical, USA) (Resin-based Cement), Adhesor Carbofine (Pentron, Czech Republic), Harvard Polycarboxylat Cement (Harvard Dental, Great Britain) (Zinc polycarboxylate types of cement) and Agatos S (Chema-Elektromet, Poland) (Zinc Phosphate Cement). Texture and fractal dimension analysis was applied. An evaluation of cytotoxicity and cell adhesion was carried out. The fractal dimension of Breeze (Pentron Clinical, USA) differed in each of the tested types of cement. Adhesor Carbofine (Pentron, Czech Republic) cytotoxicity was rated 4 on a 0-4 scale. The Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, Germany) and Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia) cements showed the most favorable conditions for the adhesion of fibroblasts, despite statistically significant differences in the fractal dimension of their surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.