ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Combined Experimental and Modeling Study for Pellet-Fed Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing to Evaluate the Impact of the Melting Efficiency.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Applications of 3D printing in aging.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Review
- Setting the Optimal Laser Power for Sustainable Powder Bed Fusion Processing of Elastomeric Polyesters: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To improve the product quality of polymeric parts realized through extrusion-based additive manufacturing (EAM) utilizing pellets, a good control of the melting is required. In the present work, we demonstrate the strength of a previously developed melt removal using a drag framework to support such improvement. This model, downscaled from conventional extrusion, is successfully validated for pellet-based EAM-hence, micro-extrusion-employing three material types with different measured rheological behavior, i.e., acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA) and styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene polymer (SEBS). The model's validation is made possible by conducting for the first time dedicated EAM screw-freezing experiments combined with appropriate image/data analysis and inputting rheological data. It is showcased that the (overall) processing temperature is crucial to enable similar melting efficiencies. The melting mechanism can vary with the material type. For ABS, an initially large contribution of viscous heat dissipation is observed, while for PLA and SEBS thermal conduction is always more relevant. It is highlighted based on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis that upon properly tuning the finalization of the melting point within the envisaged melting zone, better final material properties are achieved. The model can be further used to find an optimal balance between processing time (e.g., by variation of the screw frequency) and material product performance (e.g., strength of the printed polymeric part).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.