Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34639846›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Low-Cost, High-Throughput Digital Image Analysis of Stain Patterns on Smoked Cigarette Filter Butts to Estimate Mainstream Smoke Exposure.

Clifford H Watson, Jane Yan, Stephen Stanfill, Liza Valentin-Blasini, Roberto Bravo Cardenas, Benjamin C Blount

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clifford H WatsonU.S. Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE MS F-55, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0480-4092
Jane YanU.S. Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE MS F-55, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Stephen StanfillU.S. Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE MS F-55, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Liza Valentin-BlasiniU.S. Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE MS F-55, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Roberto Bravo CardenasU.S. Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE MS F-55, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Benjamin C BlountU.S. Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE MS F-55, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4788-8169
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard machine smoking protocols provide useful information for examining the impact of design parameters, such as filter ventilation, on mainstream smoke delivery. Unfortunately, their results do not accurately reflect human smoke exposure. Clinical research and topography devices in human studies yield insights into how products are used, but a clinical setting or smoking a cigarette attached to such a device may alter smoking behavior. To better understand smokers' use of filtered cigarette products in a more natural environment, we developed a low-cost, high-throughput approach to estimate mainstream cigarette smoke exposure on a per-cigarette basis. This approach uses an inexpensive flatbed scanner to scan smoked cigarette filter butts and custom software to analyze tar-staining patterns. Total luminosity, or optical staining density, of the scanned images provides quantitative information proportional to mainstream smoke-constituent deliveries on a cigarette-by-cigarette basis. Duplicate sample analysis using this new approach and our laboratory's gold-standard liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) solanesol method yielded comparable results (+7% bias) from the analysis of 20 commercial cigarettes brands (menthol and nonmentholated). The brands varied in design parameters such as length, filter ventilation, and diameter. Plots correlating the luminosity to mainstream smoked-nicotine deliveries on a per-cigarette basis for these cigarette brands were linear (average R

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsColoring AgentsHumansSmokeTandem Mass SpectrometryColoring AgentsSmokecigarettefilter buttsnicotinesmoke exposuretar

Identifiers

PMID34639846
PMCPMC8508382
OpenAlexW3204474371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.