Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34639582›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Analysis of Factors Affecting Employment Status of Kidney Transplant Recipients in Selected European Union Member States.

Elzbieta Wlodarczyk, Ondřej Viklický, Klemens Budde, Marie Kolářová, Leon Bergfeld, Leszek Paczek, Krzysztof Mucha, Maciej Glyda, Zbigniew Wlodarczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Organization of Post-Transplant Care and the 5-Year Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elzbieta WlodarczykDepartment of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Ondřej ViklickýInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic.
Klemens BuddeMedizinische Klinik Mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7929-5942
Marie KolářováInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic.
Leon BergfeldMedizinische Klinik Mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Leszek PaczekDepartment of Immunology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Warsaw Medical University, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof MuchaDepartment of Immunology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Warsaw Medical University, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6613-7638
Maciej GlydaDepartment of Transplantology and General Surgery, Poznan District Hospital, 60-479 Poznan, Poland.
Zbigniew WlodarczykDepartment of Transplantology and General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8730-7480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite an increasing quality of life after renal transplantation, the number of recipients undertaking paid professional work remains relatively low. Employment after kidney transplantation became a new important marker of clinically significant health recovery. Furthermore, for social and economic reasons, returning to work and participation in social life may be considered as an objective parameter that demonstrate the effectiveness of transplantation. The objectives of the following study were to evaluate the factors that determine resuming paid work after renal transplantation, to assess a patient's decision about returning to professional activity by comparative analysis of renal transplant recipients from Poland, Czech Republic and Germany, and to identify groups of patients exposed to professional exclusion in those EU countries. Five hundred renal transplant recipients from three EU countries were included into the study. The two main research methods used in the study were the SF-36 questionnaire, constructed and validated to assess the quality of life after kidney transplantation and a questionnaire constructed for the purposes of this study. Multifactorial analysis identified several risk factors associated with professional exclusions after kidney transplantation, namely young or advanced age, female gender, lack of education, place of residence in rural areas, long period of illness, and lack of occupational activity before transplantation. Despite the high standards of social care and rehabilitation support, patients in Germany failed to take up professional activity after kidney transplantation in more cases than those in Poland and Czech Republic. Surprisingly, the objective function of the kidney (creatinine level) and the multidimensional assessment of quality of life (SF-36 survey) did not have a significant association with the employment status after renal transplantation.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationEmploymentEuropean UnionFemaleHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnairesemploymentkidney transplantationquality of life

Identifiers

PMID34639582
PMCPMC8508501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.