Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34639553›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Template for Rapid Iterative Consensus of Experts (TRICE).

Angel M Chater, Gillian W Shorter, Vivien Swanson, Atiya Kamal, Tracy Epton, Madelynne A Arden, Jo Hart, Lucie M T Byrne-Davis, John Drury, Ellie Whittaker and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Angel M ChaterCentre for Health, Wellbeing and Behaviour Change, University of Bedfordshire, Bedford MK41 9EA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9043-2565
Gillian W ShorterCentre for Improving Health Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland BT7 1NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5752-2297
Vivien SwansonPsychology Division, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1685-2991
Atiya KamalSchool of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B4 7BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-6400
Tracy EptonManchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1653-191X
Madelynne A ArdenCentre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S10 2BQ, UK.
Jo HartSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9985-5137
Lucie M T Byrne-DavisSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9658-5394
John DrurySchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7748-5128
Ellie WhittakerNorth Yorkshire County Council, County Hall, Northallerton, North Yorkshire DL7 8DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8599-9316
Lesley J M LewisPublic Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK.
Emily McBrideDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Paul ChadwickCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.
Daryl B O'ConnorLaboratory for Stress and Health Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Christopher J ArmitageManchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic health emergencies require rapid responses from experts. Differing viewpoints are common in science, however, "mixed messaging" of varied perspectives can undermine credibility of experts; reduce trust in guidance; and act as a barrier to changing public health behaviours. Collation of a unified voice for effective knowledge creation and translation can be challenging. This work aimed to create a method for rapid psychologically-informed expert guidance during the COVID-19 response.

methodTRICE (Template for Rapid Iterative Consensus of Experts) brings structure, peer-review and consensus to the rapid generation of expert advice. It was developed and trialled with 15 core members of the British Psychological Society COVID-19 Behavioural Science and Disease Prevention Taskforce.

resultsUsing TRICE; we have produced 18 peer-reviewed COVID-19 guidance documents; based on rapid systematic reviews; co-created by experts in behavioural science and public health; taking 4-156 days to produce; with approximately 18 experts and a median of 7 drafts per output. We provide worked-examples and key considerations; including a shared ethos and theoretical/methodological framework; in this case; the Behaviour Change Wheel and COM-B.

conclusionTRICE extends existing consensus methodologies and has supported public health collaboration; co-creation of guidance and translation of behavioural science to practice through explicit processes in generating expert advice for public health emergencies.

Indexed as

Consensus Statements as TopicPublic HealthDelivery of Health CareHumansbehavioural scienceconsensusCOVID-19expert guidancehealth psychologyrapid reviewTRICE

Identifiers

PMID34639553
PMCPMC8508030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.