Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34639478›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Connected Community Approach: Citizens and Formal Institutions Working Together to Build Community-Centred Resilience.

Blake Poland, Anne Gloger, Garrett T Morgan, Norene Lach, Suzanne F Jackson, Rylan Urban, Imara Rolston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Approach to the Unified Conceptualization, Definition, and Characterization of Social Resilience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Blake PolandDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.
Anne GlogerCentre for Connected Communities, Toronto, ON M1E 2S2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8252-9159
Garrett T MorganDepartment of Geography & Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada.
Norene LachDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3252-3426
Suzanne F JacksonDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.
Rylan UrbanInstitute for Management & Innovation, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.
Imara RolstonDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.

Funding

CIHR PCS-164954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban resilience research is recognizing the need to complement a mainstream preoccupation with "hard" infrastructure (electrical grid, storm sewers, etc.) with attention to the "soft" (social) infrastructure issues that include the increased visibility of and role for civil society, moving from (top-down, paternalistic) government to (participatory) governance. Analyses of past shock events invariably point to the need for more concerted efforts in building effective governance and networked relations between civil society groupings and formal institutions before, during, and after crisis. However, the literature contains little advice on how to go about this. In this paper, we advance a Connected Community Approach (CCA) to building community resilience with a specific focus on the relationship between community and formal institutions. In the literature review that informs this work, we assess the current, limited models for connecting communities to formal institutions, as well as the emerging role of community-based organizations in this work, and we offer our own assessment of some of the key tensions, lacunae, and trends in the community resilience field. Principally, we explore the potential of the CCA model, as spearheaded by the East Scarborough Storefront and the Centre for Connected Communities in Toronto, Canada, as a promising approach for building the relational space between civil society and the state that is so often called for in the literature. The paper concludes with future directions for research and practice.

Indexed as

GovernmentCanadacommunity developmentcommunity resilienceconnected communities approachemergency preparednessgovernancepublic healthresilience

Identifiers

PMID34639478
PMCPMC8507759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.