Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34639461›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Natural Contaminants in Wines: Determination of Biogenic Amines by Chromatographic Techniques.

Giuliana Vinci, Lucia Maddaloni, Sabrina A Prencipe, Roberto Ruggieri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giuliana VinciDepartment of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-1831
Lucia MaddaloniDepartment of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Sabrina A PrencipeDepartment of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Roberto RuggieriDepartment of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biogenic amines (BAs) are natural contaminants of wine that originate from decarboxylase microorganisms involved in fermentation processes. The primary relevance of biogenic amines in food could have both toxic effects on consumers' health (i.e., allergic reactions, nausea, tremors, etc.), if present at high concentrations, and concurrently it can be considered as a remarkable indicator of quality and/or freshness. Therefore, the presence of nine biogenic amines [Tryptamine (TRP), ß-phenylethylamine (ß-PEA), putrescine (PUT), cadaverine (CAD), histamine (HIS), serotonin (SER), tyramine (TYR), spermidine (SPD), and spermine (SPM)] was investigated in red and white wine samples, which differed in the winemaking processes. The qualitative-quantitative determination of BAs was carried out by chromatographic methods (HPLC-UV/Vis and LC-ESI-MS). The analysis showed that both winemaking processes had all the nine BAs considered in the study at different amounts. Data showed that red wines had a higher concentration of PUT (10.52 mg L

Indexed as

WineBiogenic AminesCadaverineHistaminePutrescineBiogenic AminesCadaverineHistaminePutrescinealcoholic fermentationbiogenic aminescontaminantsfood qualityfood safetymalolactic fermentationmicroorganismsred wineswhite wineswinemaking processes

Identifiers

PMID34639461
PMCPMC8508579
OpenAlexW3202815500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.