Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34639443›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Development and Validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 8-Item in Psychiatric Patients and the General Public for Easier Mental Health Measurement in a Post COVID-19 World.

Amira Mohammed Ali, Abdulmajeed A Alkhamees, Hiroaki Hori, Yoshiharu Kim, Hiroshi Kunugi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Crocus Sativus for Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amira Mohammed AliDepartment of Behavioral Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8553, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6448-8282
Abdulmajeed A AlkhameesDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2808-2370
Hiroaki HoriDepartment of Behavioral Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8553, Japan.
Yoshiharu KimDepartment of Behavioral Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8553, Japan.
Hiroshi KunugiDepartment of Psychiatry, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.

Funding

the National Center Cohort Collaborative for Advancing Population Health funded by the Japan Health Research Promotion Bureau (JH) Research Fund Project Number 2019-(1)-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive investigations of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) since its development in 1995, its factor structure and other psychometric properties still need to be firmly established, with several calls for revising its item structure. Employing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), this study examined the factor structure of the DASS-21 and five shortened versions of the DASS-21 among psychiatric patients (N = 168) and the general public (N = 992) during the COVID-19 confinement period in Saudi Arabia. Multigroup CFA, Mann Whitney W test, Spearman's correlation, and coefficient alpha were used to examine the shortened versions of the DASS-21 (DASS-13, DASS-12, DASS-9 (two versions), and DASS-8) for invariance across age and gender groups, discriminant validity, predictive validity, item coverage, and internal consistency, respectively. Compared with the DASS-21, all three-factor structures of the shortened versions expressed good fit, with the DASS-8 demonstrating the best fit and highest item loadings on the corresponding factors in both samples (χ

Indexed as

COVID-19DepressionAnxietyFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansMental HealthPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesArabArabicceiling effectCoronavirus disease 2019/COVID-19DASS-8Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21/DASS-21discriminant validityfactorial structure/psychometric properties/structural validity/validationgood predictive validityitem coveragemeasurement invariance/multigroup analysispsychiatric disorderspsychological distressSaudi Arabiashortened version*shorter version* of the DASS-21

Identifiers

PMID34639443
PMCPMC8507889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.