Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34639437›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Expert Caregiver Intervention Targeting Former Caregivers in Finland: A Co-Design and Feasibility Study Using Mixed Methods.

Sarah Åkerman, Fredrica Nyqvist, Laura Coll-Planas, Annika Wentjärvi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Volunteering of Former Caregivers: A Pilot Intervention Study in the Chinese American Community.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah ÅkermanFaculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, 65100 Vaasa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6020-7343
Fredrica NyqvistFaculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, 65100 Vaasa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6554-8040
Laura Coll-PlanasResearch Group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, 08500 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5204-8717
Annika WentjärviFaculty of Health and Welfare, Novia University of Applied Sciences, 65200 Vaasa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1513-8251

Funding

Aktia Foundation XEuropean Agricultural Fund for Rural Development XJan-Magnus Jansson foundation for geriatrics and research on eldercare XSvenska Kulturfonden X
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informal caregivers face risks of social isolation. Given the high prevalence of informal caregivers in Europe, a considerable proportion of the population are also former caregivers. The Finnish Expert Caregiver intervention sought to train former caregivers to become volunteers aiming to support current caregivers through mainly peer support. The aims of this mixed method non-controlled exploratory intervention study were to assess the feasibility of the Finnish Expert Caregiver intervention by co-designing and implementing the intervention, and by assessing demand and practicality with special attention to the impact of COVID-19. The findings imply that the intervention was feasible as it resulted in a co-designed training course consisting of 30 h with 25 participants enrolling and 19 of them trying volunteering activities. The participants reported high scores on well-being at all timepoints of study, however, without statistically significant differences. The analysis of the focus group interviews revealed that the Expert Caregivers experienced the intervention as meaningful and offered them a sense of belonging with the other participants. Apart from using their caregiving past as an asset, the participants also took advantage of other personal skills and resources. Risks of adverse effects were related to the participants' expectations on their own contribution, demanding peer support recipients, poorly functioning peer support groups, and insufficient distance to one's caregiving past. The participants stressed the need for continuing support from intervention facilitators. Future studies with larger samples should investigate whether the effects differ between subgroups of participants and explore the perspective of the peer support recipients.

Indexed as

CaregiversCOVID-19Feasibility StudiesFinlandHumansQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2caregiverco-designfeasibilityhealth promotioninterventionlife satisfactionmixed methodsense of coherencevolunteering

Identifiers

PMID34639437
PMCPMC8508176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.