Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34639401›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Long-Term Care Facilities and Nursing Homes during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review of the Perspectives of Professionals, Families and Residents.

Domingo Palacios-Ceña, Rosario Fernández-Peña, Angela Ortega-López, Ana Fernández-Feito, Oscar Bautista-Villaécija, Olga Rodrigo-Pedrosa, José Arnau-Sánchez, Ángel Lizcano-Álvarez

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Domingo Palacios-CeñaHumanities and Qualitative Research in Health Science Research Group, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (Hum&QRinHS), 28922 Alcorcón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0669-6339
Rosario Fernández-PeñaFaculty of Nursing, Universidad de Cantabria, 39008 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6830-6001
Angela Ortega-LópezHospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9067-7677
Ana Fernández-FeitoDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5718-0570
Oscar Bautista-VillaécijaCampus Docent Sant Joan de Déu, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Olga Rodrigo-PedrosaSchool of Nursing of the Sea, Universidad Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain.
José Arnau-SánchezDirectorate General of Health Planning, Research, Pharmacy and Citizen Services, Murcia Region Health Counseling, 30071 Murcia, Spain.
Ángel Lizcano-ÁlvarezDepartment of Nursing and Stomatology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0022-9652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant repercussions for nursing home residents, their families, and professionals. The objective was to describe the perspectives of residents, their families, and nursing home employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. A scoping review was carried out using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. The inclusion criteria were: qualitative and/or mixed methods studies in English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish. The review covers studies published from 11 March 2020 to 15 February 2021. CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, British Nursing Index, Proquest, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar databases were used. We conducted a systematic narrative synthesis, presenting the results narratively and showing descriptive statistics on the studies reviewed. Sixteen documents were obtained from 175 results. Two studies focused on residents and one on their families. The remaining studies looked at professionals. Nursing homes had great difficulty managing resources, which was exacerbated by emotional exhaustion among residents, employees, and family members. In nursing homes, creative initiatives and new forms of leadership appeared to meet emerging needs during the pandemic. The results of the study show the impact of the pandemic on nursing homes and the response capacity present among residents, family members, and professionals.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansLong-Term CareNursing HomesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19elderly people over 65mixed methodsnursing homesqualitative researchscoping review

Identifiers

PMID34639401
PMCPMC8508277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.