ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Performance Measurement of Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support Tools: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Evaluating content validity for a culturally relevant wellness scale for women: the HER-WELL scale.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Article
- Developing a Set of Key Principles for Care Planning Within Older Adult Care Homes: A Modified Delphi Survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Engagement Methods in Brain Tumor Genomic Research: Multimethod Comparative Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- The Health Equity Action Network Research Coordinating Center Facilitates Meaningful Community Engagement to Promote Health Equity.American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Developing a set of key principles for care planning within older adult care homes: study protocol for a modified Delphi survey.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Community-Engaged Approach to Improve Food Access and Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables in a Rural Appalachian Community.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Community advisory boards as implementation strategies to center partner and patient voice in community health centers.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a pragmatic measure of cocreation in research engagement: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Community-engaged implementation of a safety bundle for pregnancy-related severe hypertension in the outpatient setting: protocol for a type 3 hybrid study with a multiple baseline design.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Guiding the Implementation of Wastewater-based Surveillance for Carceral Infection Control with Perspectives from People with Lived Experience of Incarceration during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Research square · 2024Article
- Aligning the planning, development, and implementation of complex interventions to local contexts with an equity focus: application of the PRISM/RE-AIM Framework.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Developing a community-led rare disease ELSI research agenda.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Review
- Article
- A Community-Engaged Process for Adapting a Cardiovascular Health Intervention for Persons with Serious Mental Illness.Ethnicity & disease · 2023Article
- Synthesizing Best Practices to Promote Health Equity for Older Adults Through Community-Engaged Research.Research in gerontological nursingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST) examines the level of partner engagement in research studies. This study used mixed methods, including web-based surveys (N = 336), a modified Delphi process (N = 18), and cognitive response interviews (N = 16), with convenience sampling to develop and validate a short version of the REST. We conducted factor analysis and calculated internal consistency for the condensed REST. We validated the condensed REST against the comprehensive REST. All analyses were carried out on two scales (quality and quantity) based on Likert-type response options. We examined convergent validity with other measures theoretically associated with the REST (e.g., the Community Engagement Research Index and the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool). This study produced a 9-item condensed version of the REST. The condensed REST loads on 1 factor, has high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92 for the quantity scale; 0.94 for the quality scale), is significantly correlated (ρ = 0.97;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.