Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34639273›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The First Random Observational Survey of Barrier Gestures against COVID-19.

Véronique Renault, Marie-France Humblet, Gianni Parisi, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Fabrice Bureau, Laurent Gillet, Sébastien Fontaine, Claude Saegerman

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Véronique RenaultFundamental and Applied Research for Animal Health (FARAH) Centre, Research Unit in Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULiege), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2529-3965
Marie-France HumbletUnit Biosafety, Department for Occupational Protection and Hygiene, Biosecurity and Environmental Licences, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.
Gianni ParisiFundamental and Applied Research for Animal Health (FARAH) Centre, Research Unit in Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULiege), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.
Anne-Françoise DonneauBiostatistics Unit, Public Health Department, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.
Fabrice BureauLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, GIGA Institute, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.
Laurent GilletImmunology-Vaccinology, Fundamental and Applied Research for Animal Health (FARAH) Centre, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1047-2525
Sébastien FontaineDepartment of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.
Claude SaegermanFundamental and Applied Research for Animal Health (FARAH) Centre, Research Unit in Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULiege), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9087-7436

Funding

University of Liège COVID-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of COVID-19 in Belgium, face-to-face teaching activities were allowed in Belgian universities at the beginning of the 2020-2021 academic year. Nevertheless, several control measures were established to control COVID-19 transmission on the campuses. To ensure compliance with these measures, a random observational survey, based on five barrier gestures, was implemented at the University of Liege (greetings without contact, hand sanitisation, following a one-way traffic flow, wearing a mask and physical distancing). Each barrier gesture was weighted, based on experts' elicitation, and a scoring system was developed. The results were presented as a diagram (to identify the margin of improvement for each barrier gesture) and a risk management barometer. In total, 526 h of observations were performed. The study revealed that some possible improvements could be made in the management of facilities, in terms of room allocation, the functionality of hydro-alcoholic gel dispensers, floor markings and one-way traffic flow. Compliance with the barrier gestures reached an overall weighted score of 68.2 (between 0 and 100). Three barrier gestures presented a lower implementation rate and should be addressed: the use of hydro-alcoholic gel (particularly when exiting buildings), compliance with the traffic flow and the maintenance of a 1.5 m physical distance outside of the auditoriums. The methodology and tool developed in the present study can easily be applied to other settings. They were proven to be useful in managing COVID-19, as the barometer that was developed and the outcomes of this survey enabled an improved risk assessment on campuses, and identified the critical points to be addressed in any further public health communication or education messages.

Indexed as

COVID-19GesturesHand DisinfectionHumansSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesbarometerbarrier gesturesBelgiumcomplianceCOVID-19observationpreventionstudent

Identifiers

PMID34639273
PMCPMC8507660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.