Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34639266›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Exploring the Impact of Linguistic Signals Transmission on Patients' Health Consultation Choice: Web Mining of Online Reviews.

Adnan Muhammad Shah, Mudassar Ali, Abdul Qayyum, Abida Begum, Heesup Han, Antonio Ariza-Montes, Luis Araya-Castillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Understanding Physicians' Motivation to Provide Healthcare Service Online in the Digital Age.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adnan Muhammad ShahDepartment of Management Sciences, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology, Islamabad 44320, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9638-3514
Mudassar AliSchool of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8869-2421
Abdul QayyumFaculty of Management Science, Riphah International University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan.
Abida BegumSchool of Marxism, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Heesup HanCollege of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, 98 Gunja-Dong, Gwanjin-Gu, Seoul 143-747, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6356-3001
Antonio Ariza-MontesSocial Matters Research Group, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, C/Escritor Castilla Aguayo, 4, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5921-0753
Luis Araya-CastilloFacultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago de Chile 7591538, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7574-3907

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients face difficulties identifying appropriate physicians owing to the sizeable quantity and uneven quality of information in physician rating websites. Therefore, an increasing dependence of consumers on online platforms as a source of information for decision-making has given rise to the need for further research into the quality of information in the form of online physician reviews (OPRs).

methodsDrawing on the signaling theory, this study develops a theoretical model to examine how linguistic signals (affective signals and informative signals) in physician rating websites affect consumers' decision making. The hypotheses are tested using 5521 physicians' six-month data drawn from two leading health rating platforms in the U.S (i.e., Healthgrades.com and Vitals.com) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A sentic computing-based sentiment analysis framework is used to implicitly analyze patients' opinions regarding their treatment choice.

resultsThe results indicate that negative sentiment, review readability, review depth, review spelling, and information helpfulness play a significant role in inducing patients' decision-making. The influence of negative sentiment, review depth on patients' treatment choice was indirectly mediated by information helpfulness.

conclusionsThis paper is a first step toward the understanding of the linguistic characteristics of information relating to the patient experience, particularly the emerging field of online health behavior and signaling theory. It is also the first effort to our knowledge that employs sentic computing-based sentiment analysis in this context and provides implications for practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansInternetLinguisticsPatient SatisfactionReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2consumer decision-makingCOVID-19online review helpfulnessphysician rating websitessentiment analysissignaling theory

Identifiers

PMID34639266
PMCPMC8507958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.