Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34638994›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Cell Viability Assessment Using Fluorescence Vital Dyes and Confocal Microscopy in Evaluating Freezing and Thawing Protocols Used in Cryopreservation of Allogeneic Venous Grafts.

Pavel Měřička, Libor Janoušek, Aleš Benda, Radka Lainková, Ján Sabó, Markéta Dalecká, Petra Prokšová, Myroslav Salmay, Rudolf Špunda, Ondřej Pecha and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Pavel MěřičkaTissue Bank, University Hospital, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Libor JanoušekDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic.
Aleš BendaImaging Methods Core Facility at BIOCEV, Operated by Faculty of Science, Charles University, 252 50 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5829-8362
Radka Lainková2nd Department of Surgery-Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Ján SabóImaging Methods Core Facility at BIOCEV, Operated by Faculty of Science, Charles University, 252 50 Prague, Czech Republic.
Markéta DaleckáImaging Methods Core Facility at BIOCEV, Operated by Faculty of Science, Charles University, 252 50 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4366-0255
Petra ProkšováImaging Methods Core Facility at BIOCEV, Operated by Faculty of Science, Charles University, 252 50 Prague, Czech Republic.
Myroslav Salmay2nd Department of Surgery-Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Rudolf Špunda2nd Department of Surgery-Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondřej PechaTechnology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Miroslava JandováTissue Bank, University Hospital, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-5458
Jiří GregorTissue Bank, University Hospital, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Lubomír ŠtěrbaTissue Bank, University Hospital, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Miroslav Špaček2nd Department of Surgery-Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8742-8330
Jaroslav Lindner2nd Department of Surgery-Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky Supported by MH CZ - DRO "General University Hospital in Prague - VFN, 00064165"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors present their contribution to the improvement of methods suitable for the detection of the freezing and thawing damage of cells of cryopreserved venous grafts used for lower limb revascularization procedures. They studied the post-thaw viability of cells of the wall of cryopreserved venous grafts (CVG) immediately after thawing and after 24 and 48 h culture at +37 °C in two groups of six CVG selected randomly for slow thawing in the refrigerator and rapid thawing in a water bath at +37 °C. The grafts were collected from multi-organ and tissue brain-dead donors, cryopreserved, and stored in a liquid nitrogen vapor phase for five years. The viability was assessed from tissue slices obtained by perpendicular and longitudinal cuts of the thawed graft samples using in situ staining with fluorescence vital dyes. The mean and median immediate post-thaw viability values above 70% were found in using both thawing protocols and both types of cutting. The statistically significant decline in viability after the 48-h culture was observed only when using the slow thawing protocol and perpendicular cutting. The possible explanation might be the "solution effect damage" during slow thawing, which caused a gentle reduction in the graft cellularity. The possible influence of this phenomenon on the immunogenicity of CVG should be the subject of further investigations.

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesFreezingAllograftsApoptosisCell SurvivalCryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideFemoral VeinHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalOptical ImagingSaphenous VeinTissue DonorsVascular GraftingCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideFluorescent Dyescell viabilityconfocal microscopycryopreservationfluorescence vital dyesThawing methodvascular allograft

Identifiers

PMID34638994
PMCPMC8509073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.