Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34638975›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Chun-Min Hsu, Yi-Ling Liao, Che-Kang Chang, Chung-Yu Lan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Oxidoreductase geneMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. The Contribution of Human Antimicrobial Peptides to Fungi.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Special Issue: Yeast Cell Signaling Pathways (Volume 1).International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Current and prospective therapeutic strategies: tacklingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Role of Sfp1 inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Antimicrobial Peptides with Anti-International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chun-Min HsuInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Yi-Ling LiaoInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Che-Kang ChangInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Chung-Yu LanInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1533-3049
National Tsing Hua University · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST105-2311-B-007-007-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST109-2311-B-007-001-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCandida albicansCathelicidinsCell WallDNA-Binding ProteinsEndoplasmic ReticulumEndoplasmic Reticulum StressFungal ProteinsGene DeletionHomeostasisHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansOxidative StressReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionUnfolded Protein ResponseAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCathelicidinsDNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesCandida albicanscell wallendoplasmic reticulumLL-37Sfp1unfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID34638975
PMCPMC8508991
OpenAlexW3202963957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.