Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34638885›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Dharmendra Singh, Priya Chaudhary, Jyoti Taunk, Chandan Kumar Singh, Deepti Singh, Ram Sewak Singh Tomar, Muraleedhar Aski, Noren Singh Konjengbam, Ranjeet Sharan Raje, Sanjay Singh and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Dharmendra SinghDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Priya ChaudharyDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Jyoti TaunkDivision of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Chandan Kumar SinghDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Deepti SinghDepartment of Botany, Meerut College, Meerut 250001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9683-8363
Ram Sewak Singh TomarCollege of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi 284003, India.
Muraleedhar AskiDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-2650
Noren Singh KonjengbamCollege of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University, Imphal 793103, India.
Ranjeet Sharan RajeDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Sanjay SinghICAR- National Institute of Plant Biotechnology, LBS Centre, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India.
Rakesh Singh SengarCollege of Biotechnology, Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel Agricultural University, Meerut 250001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7282-4135
Rajendra Kumar YadavDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur 208002, India.
Madan PalDivision of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Chaudhary Charan Singh University · INIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · INSardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology · INCentral Agricultural University · INChandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology · IN

Funding

Indian Agricultural Research Institute Project no- JAN 09 / 16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Legumes are a better source of proteins and are richer in diverse micronutrients over the nutritional profile of widely consumed cereals. However, when exposed to a diverse range of abiotic stresses, their overall productivity and quality are hugely impacted. Our limited understanding of genetic determinants and novel variants associated with the abiotic stress response in food legume crops restricts its amelioration. Therefore, it is imperative to understand different molecular approaches in food legume crops that can be utilized in crop improvement programs to minimize the economic loss. 'Omics'-based molecular breeding provides better opportunities over conventional breeding for diversifying the natural germplasm together with improving yield and quality parameters. Due to molecular advancements, the technique is now equipped with novel 'omics' approaches such as ionomics, epigenomics, fluxomics, RNomics, glycomics, glycoproteomics, phosphoproteomics, lipidomics, regulomics, and secretomics. Pan-omics-which utilizes the molecular bases of the stress response to identify genes (genomics), mRNAs (transcriptomics), proteins (proteomics), and biomolecules (metabolomics) associated with stress regulation-has been widely used for abiotic stress amelioration in food legume crops. Integration of pan-omics with novel omics approaches will fast-track legume breeding programs. Moreover, artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms can be utilized for simulating crop yield under changing environments, which can help in predicting the genetic gain beforehand. Application of machine learning (ML) in quantitative trait loci (QTL) mining will further help in determining the genetic determinants of abiotic stress tolerance in pulses.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGenomicsPlant BreedingCrops, AgriculturalFabaceaeQuantitative Trait LociStress, Physiologicalabiotic stressartificial intelligenceclimate changefood legumesgenetic gainmachine learningomics-assisted breedingpan-omics

Identifiers

PMID34638885
PMCPMC8509049
OpenAlexW3204514408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.