Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34638406›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Reference Values to Assess Hemodilution and Warn of Potential False-Negative Minimal Residual Disease Results in Myeloma.

Noemí Puig, Juan Flores-Montero, Leire Burgos, María-Teresa Cedena, Lourdes Cordón, José-Juan Pérez, Luzalba Sanoja-Flores, Irene Manrique, Paula Rodríguez-Otero, Laura Rosiñol and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. TheFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Noemí PuigHematology Department, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC (CB16/12/00233), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Juan Flores-MonteroInstitute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer CIBERONC (CB16/12/00400), Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS) and Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1119-4387
Leire BurgosClínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBERONC (CB16/12/00369), 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0998-2496
María-Teresa CedenaHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC (CB16/12/00369), 28041 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5851-3720
Lourdes CordónGrupo de Investigación en Hematología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), CIBERONC (CB16/12/00284), 46026 Valencia, Spain.
José-Juan PérezHematology Department, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC (CB16/12/00233), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Luzalba Sanoja-FloresInstitute of Biomedicine of Seville, Department of Hematology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), University of Seville, Seville, Spain & CIBERONC (CB16/12/00480), Instituto Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9275-7793
Irene ManriqueClínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBERONC (CB16/12/00369), 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Paula Rodríguez-OteroClínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBERONC (CB16/12/00369), 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Laura RosiñolHematology Department, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Joaquín Martínez-LópezHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC (CB16/12/00369), 28041 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7908-0063
María-Victoria MateosHematology Department, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC (CB16/12/00233), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-1218
Juan-José LahuertaHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC (CB16/12/00369), 28041 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3393-9570
Joan BladéHematology Department, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Jesús F San MiguelClínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBERONC (CB16/12/00369), 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-4857
Alberto OrfaoInstitute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer CIBERONC (CB16/12/00400), Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS) and Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0007-7230
Bruno PaivaClínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBERONC (CB16/12/00369), 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1977-3815
Navarre Institute of Health Research · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer CB16/12/00233Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer CB16/12/00284Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer CB16/12/00369Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer CB16/12/00400Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI15/01956Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI15/02049Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI15/02062Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/01673Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/01709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhereas, in most patients with multiple myeloma (MM), achieving undetectable MRD anticipates a favorable outcome, some others relapse shortly afterwards. Although one obvious explanation for this inconsistency is the use of nonrepresentative marrow samples due to hemodilution, there is no guidance on how to evaluate this issue.

methodsSince B-cell precursors, mast cells and nucleated red blood cells are normally absent in peripheral blood, we analyzed them in 1404 bone marrow (BM) aspirates obtained in numerous disease settings and in 85 healthy adults (HA).

resultsFirst, we confirmed the systematic detection of the three populations in HA, as well as the nonreduced numbers with aging. Pairwise comparisons between HA and MM patients grouped according to age and treatment showed significant variability, suggesting that hemodilution should be preferably evaluated with references obtained from patients treated with identical regimens. Leveraging the MRD results from 118 patients, we showed that a comparison with HA of similar age could also inform on potential hemodilution.

conclusionsOur study supports the routine assessment of BM cellularity to evaluate hemodilution, since reduced BM-specific cell types as compared to reference values (either treatment-specific or from HA if the former are unavailable) could indicate hemodilution and a false-negative MRD result.

Indexed as

hemodilutionminimal residual diseasemultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID34638406
PMCPMC8508317
OpenAlexW3203330894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.