Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34638294›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Multi-Stage Harmonization for Robust AI across Breast MR Databases.

Heather M Whitney, Hui Li, Yu Ji, Peifang Liu, Maryellen L Giger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather M WhitneyDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7258-1102
Hui LiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-2898
Yu JiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Peifang LiuTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.
Maryellen L GigerDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Funding

Quantitative Image Analysis for Assessing Response to Breast Cancer TherapyU01CA195564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Assessment of Repeatability and Robustness of Radiomics in Breast Cancer ImagingR15CA227948 · NCI · WHEATON COLLEGE · PI WHITNEY, HEATHER M · 2019 to 2019
$397k
Protected Radiomics Analysis Commons for Deep Learning in Biomedical DiscoveryS10OD025081 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2018 to 2018
$339k
National Natural Science Foundation of China 81801781NCI NIH HHS R15 CA227948NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195564NIH HHS R15 CA227948NIH HHS S10 OD025081NIH HHS U01 CA195564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomic features extracted from medical images may demonstrate a batch effect when cases come from different sources. We investigated classification performance using training and independent test sets drawn from two sources using both pre-harmonization and post-harmonization features. In this retrospective study, a database of thirty-two radiomic features, extracted from DCE-MR images of breast lesions after fuzzy c-means segmentation, was collected. There were 944 unique lesions in Database A (208 benign lesions, 736 cancers) and 1986 unique lesions in Database B (481 benign lesions, 1505 cancers). The lesions from each database were divided by year of image acquisition into training and independent test sets, separately by database and in combination. ComBat batch harmonization was conducted on the combined training set to minimize the batch effect on eligible features by database. The empirical Bayes estimates from the feature harmonization were applied to the eligible features of the combined independent test set. The training sets (A, B, and combined) were then used in training linear discriminant analysis classifiers after stepwise feature selection. The classifiers were then run on the A, B, and combined independent test sets. Classification performance was compared using pre-harmonization features to post-harmonization features, including their corresponding feature selection, evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as the figure of merit. Four out of five training and independent test scenarios demonstrated statistically equivalent classification performance when compared pre- and post-harmonization. These results demonstrate that translation of machine learning techniques with batch data harmonization can potentially yield generalizable models that maintain classification performance.

Indexed as

breast cancercomputer-aided diagnosisharmonizationmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingradiomics

Identifiers

PMID34638294
PMCPMC8508003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.