ArticleCancers2021
Dynamic
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiolabelled ZnO, Iron Oxide-Based, and Gold Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Synthesis, Surface Engineering, and Radiolabelling Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluation of [Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Mechanism of CXCL8 regulation of methionine metabolism to promote angiogenesis in gliomas.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Recent Update on PET/CT Radiotracers for Imaging Cerebral Glioma.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Recurrence Patterns after Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma with [(11)C]methionine Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Irradiation for Target Volume Optimization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A comparison study of dynamic [Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Differentiating high-grade glioma progression from treatment-related changes with dynamic [European radiology · 2023Article
- Radiolabeled nanomaterial for cancer diagnostics and therapeutics: principles and concepts.Cancer nanotechnology · 2023Review
- Relevance of DynamicBiomedicines · 2021Article
- Nanoscale Radiotheranostics for Cancer Treatment: From Bench to Bedside.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe prognostic evaluation of glioma recurrence patients is important in the therapeutic management. We investigated the prognostic value of
methodsSixty-seven consecutive patients who underwent MET-PET for suspected glioma recurrence at MR were retrospectively included. Twenty-one patients underwent static MET-PET; 46/67 underwent dynamic MET-PET. In all patients, SUVmax, SUVmean and tumour-to-background ratio (T/B) were calculated. From dynamic acquisition, the shape and slope of time-activity curves, time-to-peak and its SUVmax (SUVmax
resultsThe overall median follow-up was 19 months from MET-PET. Recurrence patients (38/67) had higher SUVmax (
conclusionSemiquantitative parameters and SUVmax
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.