Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34638223›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Risk Factors for Radiation Necrosis in Patients Undergoing Cranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Johannes Kerschbaumer, Matthias Demetz, Aleksandrs Krigers, Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel, Claudius Thomé, Christian F Freyschlag

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Radionecrosis risk and local control after CyberKnifeRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johannes KerschbaumerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9997-4336
Matthias DemetzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Aleksandrs KrigersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0950-426X
Meinhard Nevinny-StickelDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Claudius ThoméDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian F FreyschlagDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8228-8217
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesingle-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established part of the multimodal treatment in neuro-oncology. Radiation necrosis after high-dose irradiation is a known complication, but there is a lack of evidence about the risk factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible risk factors for radiation necrosis in patients undergoing radiosurgery.

methodspatients treated with radiosurgery between January 2004 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data, imaging and medication were gathered from electronic patient records. The largest diameter of the tumors was measured using MRI scans in T1 weighted imaging with gadolinium and the edema in T2 weighted sequences. The diagnosis of a radiation necrosis was established analyzing imaging criteria combined with clinical course or pathologically confirmed by subsequent surgical intervention. Patients developing radiation necrosis detected after SRS were compared to patients without evidence of an overshooting irradiation reaction.

results388 patients were included retrospectively, 61 (15.7%) of whom developed a radiation necrosis. Median follow-up was 24 (6-62) months with a radiation necrosis after 8 (6-12) months. The most frequent tumors were metastases in 47.2% of the cases, followed by acoustic neuromas in 32.2% and meningiomas in 13.4%. Seventy-three (18.9%) patients already underwent one or more previous radiosurgical procedures for different lesions. The mean largest diameter of the tumors amounted to 16.3 mm (±6.1 mm). The median-80%-isodose administered was 16 (14-25) Gy. Of the radiation necroses, 25 (43.1%) required treatment, in 23 (39.7%) thereof, medical treatment was applied and in 2 (3.4%) cases, debulking surgery was performed. In this study, significantly more radiation necroses arose in patients with higher doses (HR 1.3 [CI 1.2; 1.5],

conclusionlarge diameter and high doses were reliable independent risk factors leading to more frequent radiation necroses, regardless of tumor type in patients undergoing radiosurgery. Alternative therapeutic procedures may be considered in lesions with large volume and an expected high radiation doses due to the increased risk of developing radiation necrosis.

Indexed as

acoustic neuromabrain metastasismeningiomaradiation doseradiation necrosisradiotherapyrisk factorsSRSstereotactic radiosurgerytumor diameter

Identifiers

PMID34638223
PMCPMC8507553
OpenAlexW3201299141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.