ReviewCancers2021
Decisional Regret in Female Oncofertility Decision Making-An Integrative Narrative Review.
Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital health interventions for oncofertility in female patients: a systematic review.Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Pooled it
- Oncofertility information interventions in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Review
- From consultation to choice: gynecologic cancer patients' perspectives on shared decision making in clinical practice - findings from a cross-sectional observational qualitative interview study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Observational
- Development and validation of a nursing practice scale for supporting fertility preservation decision-making in women with cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Developing and validating an evidence-based health promotion program for reproductive donors reflecting their challenges in the process of donation decision-making: a multi-method study protocol.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Fertility Information Perceptions and Needs of People with Cancer, Their Family Members, and Caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Counseling and cryopreservation: evaluation of patient-reported counseling and choice on method of cancer-related fertility preservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Fertility preservation counseling for women of reproductive age diagnosed with cancer: an integrative review.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2024Review
- Ethical, legal, social, and policy issues of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal girls: a critical interpretive review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Fertility preservation choices and decisional regret after gender-affirming surgery in transgender men or gender nonbinary persons.F&S reports · 2024Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Fertility Intention Scale among Patients with Breast Cancer of Childbearing Age in Mainland China.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Article
- Quality of Life in Underrepresented Cancer Populations.Cancers · 2022Article
- Fertility support for patients with gynaecological cancers - a vital but neglected issue.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Melatonin prevents cyclophosphamide-induced primordial follicle loss by inhibiting ovarian granulosa cell apoptosis and maintaining AMH expression.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It is well established that fertility is an important issue for young women with cancer at reproductive age, as many have not initiated or completed their parenthood goals when diagnosed. Because cancer treatments may impair fertility, women face fertility decisions that are often complex and surrounded by uncertainty. This may put patients at risk for psychological distress and the experience of regret regarding decisions made at diagnosis, which may be associated with a negative impact on women's QoL. This narrative review addresses current knowledge about decisional regret regarding fertility preservation decisions in adult female cancer patients at reproductive age. Electronic searches were conducted on Pubmed database for articles published in English from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2021 that assessed decisional regret following fertility decisions in young women diagnosed at childbearing age. Of the 96 articles identified, nine provided information on decisional regret regarding fertility decisions. Studies reported that, overall, decisional regret regarding oncofertility decisions was low. Factors associated with the experience of decisional regret were patients' perceived quality and satisfaction with fertility counseling received, the decision to undergo fertility preservation, desire for children and decisional conflict. Health providers should be aware of the factors that are potentially modifiable and prone to improvement in order to reduce decisional regret. All efforts should be made to improve availability of and access to tailored high quality fertility counseling and fertility preservation. Given the growing evidence that decision aids (DAs) are effective in increasing knowledge and reducing decisional conflict and regret, their use in a routine and timely manner to complement fertility counseling is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.