Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34637520›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2021

Repeatability of gaseous measurements across consecutive days in sheep using portable accumulation chambers.

Edel O'Connor, Fiona M McGovern, Daire T Byrne, Tommy M Boland, Eoin Dunne, Nóirín McHugh

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edel O'ConnorAnimal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Fiona M McGovernAnimal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Daire T ByrneAnimal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Tommy M BolandSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Eoin DunneAnimal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Nóirín McHughAnimal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.

Funding

EU Horizon Research and Innovation Programme 818368GrasstoGas 2019EN202Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine GreenBreed 17/S/2135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Portable accumulation chambers (PACs) enable gaseous emissions from small ruminants to be measured over a 50-min period; to date, however, the repeatability of consecutive days of measurement in the PAC has not been investigated. The objectives of this study were 1) to investigate the repeatability of consecutive days of gaseous measurements in the PAC, 2) to determine the number of days required to achieve precise gaseous measurements, and 3) to develop a prediction equation for gaseous emissions in sheep. A total of 48 ewe lambs (c. 10 to 11 mo of age) were randomly divided into four measurement groups each day, for 17 consecutive days. Gaseous measurements were conducted between 0800 and 1200 hours daily. Animals were removed from perennial ryegrass silage for at least 1 h before measurements in the PAC, and animals were assigned randomly to each of the 12 chambers. Methane (CH4; ppm) concentration, oxygen (O2; %), and carbon dioxide (CO2; %) were measured at three time points (0, 25, and 50 min after entry of the first animal into the first chamber). To quantify the effect of animal and day variation on gaseous emissions, between-animal, between-day, and error variances were calculated for each gaseous measurement using a linear mixed model. The number of days required to gain a certain precision (defined as the 95% confidence interval range) for each gaseous measurement was also calculated. For all three gases, the between-day variance (39% to 40%) accounted for a larger proportion of total variance compared with between-animal variance, while the repeatability of 17 consecutive days of measurement was 0.36, 0.31, and 0.23 for CH4, CO2, and O2, respectively. Correlations between consecutive days of measurement were strong for all three gases; the strongest correlation between day 1 and the remaining days for CH4, CO2, and O2 was 0.71 (days 1 and 6), 0.77 (days 1 and 2), and 0.83 (days 1 and 5), respectively. A high level of precision was achieved when gaseous measurements from PAC were taken over three consecutive days. The prediction equation overestimated gaseous production for all three gases: the correlations between actual and predicted gaseous output ranged from 0.67 to 0.71, with the r2 ranging from 0.45 to 0.71. The results from this study will aid the refinement of the protocol for the measurement of gaseous emissions in sheep using the PAC.

Indexed as

MethaneSilageAnimalsCarbon DioxideFemaleRuminantsSheepCarbon DioxideMethanemethane emissionsportable accumulation chambersrepeatabilitysheep

Identifiers

PMID34637520
PMCPMC8782229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.