Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34637451›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2021

Associations between cesarean delivery and child mortality: A national record linkage longitudinal study of 17.8 million births in Brazil.

Enny S Paixao, Christian Bottomley, Julia M Pescarini, Kerry L M Wong, Luciana L Cardim, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro Silva, Elizabeth B Brickley, Laura C Rodrigues, Flavia Jôse Oliveira Alves, Maria do Carmo Leal and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Enny S PaixaoInfectious Disease Department, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-908X
Christian BottomleyInfectious Disease Department, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5241-8412
Julia M PescariniInfectious Disease Department, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8711-9589
Kerry L M WongInfectious Disease Department, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4400-2257
Luciana L CardimCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Rita de Cássia Ribeiro SilvaCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8387-9254
Elizabeth B BrickleyInfectious Disease Department, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0280-2288
Laura C RodriguesInfectious Disease Department, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Flavia Jôse Oliveira AlvesCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1613-2270
Maria do Carmo LealSergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3047-515X
Maria da Conceicao N CostaCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Maria Gloria TeixeiraCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3318-3408
Maria Yury IchiharaCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8590-6212
Liam SmeethInfectious Disease Department, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Mauricio L BarretoCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0215-4930
Oona M R CampbellInfectious Disease Department, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9311-0115
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BREscola Nacional de Saúde Pública · BR

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 202912/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 213589/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an increasing use of cesarean delivery (CD) based on preference rather than on medical indication. However, the extent to which nonmedically indicated CD benefits or harms child survival remains unclear. Our hypothesis was that in groups with a low indication for CD, this procedure would be associated with higher child mortality and in groups with a clear medical indication CD would be associated with improved child survival chances. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a population-based cohort study in Brazil by linking routine data on live births between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018 and assessing mortality up to 5 years of age. Women with a live birth who contributed records during this period were classified into one of 10 Robson groups based on their pregnancy and delivery characteristics. We used propensity scores to match CD with vaginal deliveries (1:1) and prelabor CD with unscheduled CD (1:1) and estimated associations with child mortality using Cox regressions. A total of 17,838,115 live births were analyzed. After propensity score matching (PSM), we found that live births to women in groups with low expected frequencies of CD (Robson groups 1 to 4) had a higher death rate up to age 5 years if they were born via CD compared with vaginal deliveries (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.28; p < 0.001). The relative rate was greatest in the neonatal period (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.45; p < 0.001). There was no difference in mortality rate when comparing offspring born by a prelabor CD to those born by unscheduled CD. For the live births to women with a CD in a prior pregnancy (Robson group 5), the relative rates for child mortality were similar for those born by CD compared with vaginal deliveries (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.10; p = 0.024). In contrast, for live births to women in groups with high expected rates of CD (Robson groups 6 to 10), the child mortality rate was lower for CD than for vaginal deliveries (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.89 to 0.91; p < 0.001), particularly in the neonatal period (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.85; p < 0.001). Our results should be interpreted with caution in clinical practice, since relevant clinical data on CD indication were not available.

conclusionsIn this study, we observed that in Robson groups with low expected frequencies of CD, this procedure was associated with a 25% increase in child mortality. However, in groups with high expected frequencies of CD, the findings suggest that clinically indicated CD is associated with a reduction in child mortality.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionChild MortalityHospital RecordsParturitionAdultBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornKaplan-Meier Estimate

Identifiers

PMID34637451
PMCPMC8509988
OpenAlexW3206509346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.