Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34637337›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2021

Andrew J Wagner, Vinod Ravi, Richard F Riedel, Kristen Ganjoo, Brian A Van Tine, Rashmi Chugh, Lee Cranmer, Erlinda M Gordon, Jason L Hornick, Heng Du and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 95 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Phase II Trial ofJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. How I treat soft tissue sarcomas.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  18. Malignant uterine PEComa: a narrative literature review and challenging case report.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 6 countries.

Andrew J WagnerDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA.ORCID 0000-0002-4384-9448
Vinod RaviMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-6080-9336
Richard F RiedelDuke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-5412-8710
Kristen GanjooStanford University, Stanford, CA.
Brian A Van TineWashington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-4572-6668
Rashmi ChughUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-4633-6971
Lee CranmerUniversity of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Erlinda M GordonSarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, CA.
Jason L HornickBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-6475-8345
Heng DuBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-9067-0910
Berta GrigorianAadi Bioscience Inc, Pacific Palisades, CA.
Anita N SchmidAadi Bioscience Inc, Pacific Palisades, CA.
Shihe HouAadi Bioscience Inc, Pacific Palisades, CA.
Katherine HarrisAadi Bioscience Inc, Pacific Palisades, CA.
David J KwiatkowskiBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-5668-5219
Neil P DesaiAadi Bioscience Inc, Pacific Palisades, CA.
Mark A DicksonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Roche (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tuberous Sclerosis-Pathway and PathogenesisP01CA120964 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI David J. Kwiatkowski · 2007 to 2026
$35.9M
Phase 2 study of ABI-009 Treatment of Advanced PEComa-IND 125669, 7/13/2015R01FD005749 · FDA · AADI, LLC · PI DESAI, NEIL · 2017 to 2020
$2.0M
FDA HHS R01 FD005749NCI NIH HHS P01 CA120964NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMalignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is a rare aggressive sarcoma, with no approved treatment. To our knowledge, this phase II, single-arm, registration trial is the first prospective clinical trial in this disease, investigating the safety and efficacy of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with malignant PEComa were treated with

resultsThirty-four patients were treated (safety evaluable), and 31 were evaluable for efficacy. The overall response rate was 39% (12 of 31; 95% CI, 22 to 58) with one complete and 11 partial responses, 52% (16 of 31) of patients had stable disease, and 10% (3 of 31) had progressive disease. Responses were of rapid onset (67% by week 6) and durable. Median duration of response was not reached after a median follow-up for response of 2.5 years, with 7 of 12 responders with treatment ongoing (range, 5.6-47.2+ months). Twenty-five of 31 patients had tumor mutation profiling: 8 of 9 (89%) patients with a

conclusion

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlbuminsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNanoparticlesNeoplasm MetastasisPerivascular Epithelioid Cell NeoplasmsPrognosisProspective StudiesSirolimusSurvival RateAlbuminsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID34637337
PMCPMC8601264
OpenAlexW3207811858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.