ReviewEndocrine2022
Controversy on the management of patients carrying RET p.V804M mutation.
Review in Endocrine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextRET p.V804M is classified as a moderate risk mutation for familial medullary thyroid cancer (FMTC). There is a significant controversy on the management of patients carrying this mutation. We describe a family incidentally discovered to have this mutation and review the literature on RET p.V804M mutation.
resultsThe proband was born to first-degree relative parents. He was noticed to have hypertrophy of some parts of the body and vascular skin changes. Whole-exome sequencing of DNA extracted from a skin biopsy showed a mutation in the PIK3CA (c.3132T>G, p.ASN1044LYS). This variant was not found in DNA extracted from blood. This confirmed the diagnosis of CLOVES syndrome (Congenital Lipomatous Overgrowth, Vascular malformations, Epidermal nevi and Scoliosis, skeletal or spinal anomalies). Another incidentally found mutation in the skin biopsy and blood sample was RET p.V804M. Although there was no family history of MTC or MEN 2 syndromes, family screening revealed RET p.V804M mutation and FMTC in the proband's father, paternal grandmother, one sister, and one aunt. There was significant interfamilial heterogeneity in the age of presentation and pathology. A review of literature showed that RET p.V804M mutation is a moderate risk mutation associated with late-onset FMTC, usually at middle to old age.
conclusionDespite the controversy and the heterogeneous presentation of patients with RET p.V804M mutation, our study and review of the literature suggest that this seemingly "low" risk mutation is associated with late-onset but potentially aggressive MTC. This indicates the need for follow-up and timely intervention based on calcitonin level elevation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.