ArticleHeart and vessels2022
Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation without the use of a contrast medium: a combination of the intracardiac echocardiography and pressure wave monitoring guided approach.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of intracardiac echocardiography in atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison between contrast-guided and pressure-guided ablation using the novel pressure visualization tool for cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Article
- The use of Intracardiac Echocardiography in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024Article
- 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Cryoballoon ablation without use of contrast for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Cardiology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In cryoballoon ablation (CBA), a contrast medium is commonly used to confirm balloon occlusion of the pulmonary veins (PVs). However, a contrast medium cannot always be used in patients with renal dysfunction and allergy. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CBA without the use of a contrast medium. We retrospectively examined consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who underwent first-time CBA. We compared the procedural results and outcomes in patients for whom a contrast medium was used (contrast group) and those from whom a contrast medium was not used (non-contrast group). In the non-contrast group, we used saline injection on the intracardiac echocardiography and pressure wave monitoring for PV occlusion. Fifty patients (200 PVs) and 22 patients (88 PVs) underwent CBA with and without a contrast medium, respectively. The success rate of PV isolation with CBA alone was 93% and 90% in the non-contrast and contrast groups, respectively (p = 0.40). The fluoroscopy time and nadir temperature were significantly lower in the non-contrast group as compared to that in the contrast group. The recurrence rate 1 year after ablation did not differ between the two groups (18% vs. 18%, p > 0.99). Furthermore, the number of reconnected PVs in patients with recurrence was significantly lower in the non-contrast group than in the contrast group (6% vs. 36%, p = 0.017). In conclusion, CBA using the intracardiac echocardiography and pressure monitoring approach without the use of a contrast medium was safe and efficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34636968What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.