Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636962›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Fuhrman nuclear grade prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: influence of volume of interest delineation strategies on machine learning-based dynamic enhanced CT radiomics analysis.

Shiwei Luo, Ruili Wei, Songlin Lu, Shengsheng Lai, Jialiang Wu, Zhe Wu, Xinrui Pang, Xinhua Wei, Xinqing Jiang, Xin Zhen and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shiwei Luo *Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Ruili Wei *Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Songlin LuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Shengsheng LaiSchool of Medical Equipment, Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510520, China.
Jialiang WuDepartment of Radiology, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China.
Zhe WuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Xinrui PangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Xinhua WeiDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Xinqing JiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Xin ZhenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China. xinzhen@smu.edu.cn.
Ruimeng YangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China. eyruimengyang@scut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2768-9429
Guangzhou First People's Hospital · CNSouthern Medical University · CNGuangdong Food and Drug Vocational College · CNUniversity of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital · CN

Funding

national natural science foundation of china 81874216national natural science foundation of china 81971574natural science foundation of guangdong province 2021A1515011350science and technology project of guangzhou (cn) 201904010422science and technology project of guangzhou (cn) 202002030268science and technology project of guangzhou (cn) 202102010025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the influence of different volume of interest (VOI) delineation strategies on machine learning-based predictive models for discrimination between low and high nuclear grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.

methodsThis study retrospectively collected 177 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC (124 low-grade; 53 high-grade). Tumor VOI was manually segmented, followed by artificially introducing uncertainties as: (i) contour-focused VOI, (ii) margin erosion of 2 or 4 mm, and (iii) margin dilation (2, 4, or 6 mm) inclusive of perirenal fat, peritumoral renal parenchyma, or both. Radiomics features were extracted from four-phase CT images (unenhanced phase (UP), corticomedullary phase (CMP), nephrographic phase (NP), excretory phase (EP)). Different combinations of four-phasic features for each VOI delineation strategy were used to build 176 classification models. The best VOI delineation strategy and superior CT phase were identified and the top-ranked features were analyzed.

resultsFeatures extracted from UP and EP outperformed features from other single/combined phase(s). Shape features and first-order statistics features exhibited superior discrimination. The best performance (ACC 81%, SEN 67%, SPE 87%, AUC 0.87) was achieved with radiomics features extracted from UP and EP based on contour-focused VOI.

conclusionShape and first-order features extracted from UP + EP images are better feature representations. Contour-focused VOI erosion by 2 mm or dilation by 4 mm within peritumor renal parenchyma exerts limited impact on discriminative performance. It provides a reference for segmentation tolerance in radiomics-based modeling for ccRCC nuclear grading. KEY POINTS: • Lesion delineation uncertainties are tolerated within a VOI erosion range of 2 mm or dilation range of 4 mm within peritumor renal parenchyma for radiomics-based ccRCC nuclear grading. • Radiomics features extracted from unenhanced phase and excretory phase are superior to other single/combined phase(s) at differentiating high vs low nuclear grade ccRCC. • Shape features and first-order statistics features showed superior discriminative capability compared to texture features.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCarcinoma, renal cellMachine learningNeoplasm gradingPathologyTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID34636962
OpenAlexW3205003192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.