Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636916›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Evaluation of Population-Level Changes Associated With the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Recommendations in Community-Based Health Care Systems.

Debra P Ritzwoller, Rafael Meza, Nikki M Carroll, Erica Blum-Barnett, Andrea N Burnett-Hartman, Robert T Greenlee, Stacey A Honda, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Katharine A Rendle, Anil Vachani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lung Cancer Screening Participation Among Indigenous Peoples Worldwide: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Using Telehealth to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Referrals for At-Risk Veterans in Rural Communities.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Debra P RitzwollerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora.
Rafael MezaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Nikki M CarrollInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora.
Erica Blum-BarnettInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora.
Andrea N Burnett-HartmanInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora.
Robert T GreenleeMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin.
Stacey A HondaCenter for Integrated Healthcare Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Oahu.
Christine Neslund-DudasHenry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
Katharine A RendlePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Anil VachaniPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USHenry Ford Health System · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USMarshfield Clinic · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Center for Research to Optimize Precision Lung Cancer Screening in Diverse PopulationsUM1CA221939 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI RITZWOLLER, DEBRA P, VACHANI, ANIL · 2018 to 2023
$15.3M
Natural History of Lung Cancer Diagnosed Within and Across Diverse Health Systems Implementing Lung Cancer ScreeningR50CA251966 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CARROLL, NIKKI · 2020 to 2024
$751k
NCI NIH HHS R50 CA251966NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA221939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released updated lung cancer screening recommendations in 2021, lowering the screening age from 55 to 50 years and smoking history from 30 to 20 pack-years. These changes are expected to expand screening access to women and racial and ethnic minority groups. Objective: To estimate the population-level changes associated with the 2021 USPSTF expansion of lung cancer screening eligibility by sex, race and ethnicity, sociodemographic factors, and comorbidities in 5 community-based health care systems. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed data of patients who received care from any of 5 community-based health care systems (which are members of the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium, a collaboration that conducts research to better understand how to improve the cancer screening processes in community health care settings) from January 1, 2010, through September 30, 2019. Individuals who had complete smoking history and were engaged with the health care system for 12 or more continuous months were included. Those who had never smoked or who had unknown smoking history were excluded. Exposures: Electronic health record-derived age, sex, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), comorbidities, and smoking history. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in the proportion of the newly eligible population by age, sex, race and ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis, and SES as well as lung cancer diagnoses under the 2013 recommendations vs the expected cases under the 2021 recommendations were evaluated using χ2 tests. Results: As of September 2019, there were 341 163 individuals aged 50 to 80 years who currently or previously smoked. Among these, 34 528 had electronic health record data that captured pack-year and quit-date information and were eligible for lung cancer screening according to the 2013 USPSTF recommendations. The 2021 USPSTF recommendations expanded screening eligibility to 18 533 individuals, representing a 53.7% increase. Compared with the 2013 cohort, the newly eligible 2021 population included 5833 individuals (31.5%) aged 50 to 54 years, a larger proportion of women (52.0% [n = 9631]), and more racial or ethnic minority groups. The relative increases in the proportion of newly eligible individuals were 60.6% for Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander; 67.4% for Hispanic; 69.7% for non-Hispanic Black; and 49.0% for non-Hispanic White groups. The relative increase for women was 13.8% higher than for men (61.2% vs 47.4%), and those with a lower comorbidity burden and lower SES had higher relative increases (eg, 68.7% for a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 0; 61.1% for lowest SES). The 2021 recommendations were associated with an estimated 30% increase in incident lung cancer diagnoses compared with the 2013 recommendations. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study suggests that, in diverse health care systems, adopting the 2021 USPSTF recommendations will increase the number of women, racial and ethnic minority groups, and individuals with lower SES who are eligible for lung cancer screening, thus helping to minimize the barriers to screening access for individuals with high risk for lung cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPopulation DynamicsPreventive MedicineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34636916
PMCPMC8511972
OpenAlexW3206872379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.