Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636914›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2021

Immunogenicity and Safety of a 3-Antigen Hepatitis B Vaccine vs a Single-Antigen Hepatitis B Vaccine: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Timo Vesikari, Adam Finn, Pierre van Damme, Isabel Leroux-Roels, Geert Leroux-Roels, Nathan Segall, Azhar Toma, Gerald Vallieres, Ronnie Aronson, Dennis Reich and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03408730 (A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Lot-to-lot Consistency of Sci-B-Vac™ in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03408730 phase3completednot on this map

A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Lot-to-lot Consistency of Sci-B-Vac™ in Adults (CONSTANT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVBI Vaccines Inc.Ran2017 to 2019Enrolled2,838ConditionsHepatitis B VaccinesArmsHepatitis B Vaccination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Harnessing Nanocarriers to Advance Vaccine Development.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Neo-antigen tumor vaccination depends on CD4-licensing conveyed by adeno-associated virus like particles.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Timo VesikariNordic Research Network Ltd, Tampere, Finland.
Adam FinnBristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Pierre van DammeUniversity of Antwerp-Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Universiteitsplein, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Isabel Leroux-RoelsGent University, Gent, Belgium.
Geert Leroux-RoelsGent University, Gent, Belgium.
Nathan SegallClinical Research Atlanta, Stockbridge, Georgia.
Azhar TomaManna Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gerald VallieresManna Research, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Ronnie AronsonLMC Diabetes and Endocrinology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dennis ReichMedicor Research Inc, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Samir AroraAventiv Research, Columbus, Ohio.
Peter J RuaneRuane Clinical Research Group Inc, Los Angeles, California.
Clancy L ConeMontana Medical Research Inc, Missoula.
Michael MannsMedizinishe Hochschule, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Catherine CosgroveSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Saul N FaustNIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Maheshi N RamasamyOxford Vaccine Group, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nathalie MachlufVBI Vaccines Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Johanna N SpaansVBI Vaccines Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Bebi Yassin-RajkumarVBI Vaccines Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
David AndersonVBI Vaccines Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Vlad PopovicVBI Vaccines Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Francisco Diaz-MitomaVBI Vaccines Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
CONSTANT Study Group
Ghent University · BEManna Research · CABristol Royal Hospital for Children · GBChurchill Hospital · GBClinical Research Atlanta · USHochschule Hannover · DELMC Diabetes & Endocrinology (Canada) · CARuane Medical · USSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Sudbury · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is a need for improved immunogenicity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines among young adults with risk of infection. Objectives: To demonstrate manufacturing equivalence of a 3-antigen (3A) HBV vaccine, evaluate noninferiority of seroprotection rate (SPR) of 3A-HBV vs single-antigen (1A) HBV after 2 and 3 vaccine doses, and compare safety and reactogenicity between 3A-HBV and 1A-HBV vaccines. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial included healthy adults aged 18 to 45 years randomized to 1 of three 3A-HBV groups or 1 control group receiving 1A-HBV. The trial was conducted at 37 community clinics and academic hospitals in Canada, Europe, the United Kingdom, and the United States between December 2017 and October 2019. Participants were followed up for 48 weeks after the first vaccination. Interventions: Intramuscular administration of 3A-HBV (10 μg) or 1A-HBV (20 μg) on days 0, 28, and 168. Main Outcomes and Measures: Geometric mean concentration (GMC) of serum hepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs) and proportion of participants achieving seroprotection. Results: Of 2838 participants, 1638 (57.8%) were women, 2595 (91.5%) were White, and 161 (5.7%) were Black or African American. A total of 712 participants (25.1%) were randomized to the 1A-HBV group and 2126 (74.9%) to 3A-HBV. The mean (SD) age at informed consent was 33.5 (8.0) years. The study demonstrated 3A-HBV lot-to-lot consistency, as the 2-sided 95% CIs for each pairwise comparison for the anti-HBs GMC ratios were within 0.67 and 1.50 (eg, adjusted GMC ratio, lot A vs lot B: 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-1.00; lot A vs lot C: 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.15; lot B vs lot C: 1.16; 95% CI, 0.95-1.41). The SPR of the pooled 3A-HBV was noninferior to 1A-HBV and higher than 1A-HBV after 2 vaccinations at day 168 (90.4% [95% CI, 89.0%-91.8%] vs 51.6% [95% CI, 47.5%-55.6%]) and 3 vaccinations at day 196 (99.3% [95% CI, 98.7%-99.6%] vs 94.8% [95% CI, 92.7%-96.4%]). The mean GMC of anti-HBs with 3A-HBV was 7.9 times higher after 2 vaccinations at day 168 and 3.5 times higher after 3 vaccinations at day 196 compared with 1A-HBV (after 2 vaccinations, 3A-HBV: GMC, 118.7 mIU/mL; 95% CI, 108.0-129.0 mIU/mL; SE, 1.0 mIU/mL; 1A-HBV: GMC, 15.0 mIU/mL; 95% CI, 12.9-17.5 mIU/mL; SE, 1.0 mIU/mL; after 3 vaccinations, 3A-HBV: GMC, 5442.4 mIU/mL; 95% CI, 4967.0-5963.0 mIU/mL; SE, 1.0 mIU/mL; 1A-HBV: 1567.2 mIU/mL; 95% CI, 1338.0-1834.0 mIU/mL; SE, 1.0 mIU/mL). Rates of local and systemic reactogenicities were higher with 3A-HBV compared with 1A-HBV (local: 1805 of 2124 [85.0%] vs 469 of 712 [65.9%]; systemic: 1445 [68.0%] vs 428 [60.1%]). Vaccine discontinuation due to adverse events (AE) was uncommon, and serious AEs were infrequent, reported in 42 participants (2.0%) and 3 participants (0.4%) in the 3A-HBV and 1A-HBV groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, consistently higher antibody concentrations and SPRs were found with 3A-HBV after 2 and 3 doses vs 1A-HBV in adults aged 18 to 45 years old. The safety and efficacy of 3A-HBV shows its usefulness for the prevention of hepatitis B in young healthy adults. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03408730; EU Clinical Trials Number: 2017-001820-22.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis B VaccinesHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMaleMiddle AgedHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis B Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34636914
PMCPMC8511978
OpenAlexW3206441429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.