Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636908›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2021

Experiences of Physical Therapists and Professional Leaders With Implementing a Toolkit to Advance Walking Assessment Poststroke: A Realist Evaluation.

Nancy M Salbach, Alison McDonald, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Beverly Bulmer, Jo-Anne Howe, Mark T Bayley, Sara McEwen, Michelle Nelson, Patricia Solomon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nancy M SalbachDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alison McDonaldNova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Marilyn MacKay-LyonsSchool of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Beverly BulmerUnity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jo-Anne HoweDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark T BayleyKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sara McEwenSelkirk College, Castlegar, British Columbia, Canada.
Michelle NelsonLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia SolomonSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe iWalk study showed significant increase in use of the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) poststroke following provision of a toolkit. This paper examined the influence of contextual circumstances on use of the toolkit and implementation strategy across acute care and inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings.

methodsA theory-based toolkit and implementation strategy was designed to support guideline recommendations to use standardized tools for evaluation of walking, education, and goal-setting poststroke. The toolkit comprised a mobile app, video, and educational guide outlining instructions for 3 learning sessions. After completing learning sessions, 33 physical therapists and 7 professional leaders participated in focus groups or interviews. As part of a realist evaluation, the study compared and synthesized site-specific context-mechanism-outcome descriptions across sites to refine an initial theory of how the toolkit would influence practice.

resultsAnalysis revealed 3 context-mechanism-outcomes: (1) No onsite facilitator? No practice change in acute care: Without an onsite facilitator, participants lacked authority to facilitate and coordinate the implementation strategy; (2) Onsite facilitation fostered integration of select practices in acute care: When onsite facilitation occurred in acute care, walk test administration and use of reference values for patient education were adopted variably with high functioning patients; (3) Onsite facilitation fostered integration of most practices in rehabilitation settings: When onsite facilitation occurred, many participants incorporated 1 or both tests to evaluate and monitor walking capacity, and reference values were applied for inpatient and outpatient education and goal setting. Participants preferentially implemented the 10MWT over the 6MWT because set-up and administration were easier and a greater proportion of patients could walk 10 m.

conclusionFindings underscore contextual factors and activities essential to eliciting change in assessment practice in stroke rehabilitation across care settings. IMPACT: This study shows that to foster recommended walking assessment practices, an onsite facilitator should be present to enable learning sessions and toolkit use.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke RehabilitationTranslational Science, BiomedicalWalk TestYoung AdultGuidelinesKnowledge TranslationStandardized AssessmentStrokeToolkitWalking

Identifiers

PMID34636908
PMCPMC8715419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.