Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636741›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

An mHealth App to Support Fertility Patients Navigating the World of Infertility (Infotility): Development and Usability Study.

Katya Kruglova, Siobhan Bernadette Laura O'Connell, Shrinkhala Dawadi, Eden Noah Gelgoot, Skye A Miner, Stephanie Robins, Joy Schinazi, Phyllis Zelkowitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katya KruglovaLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3537-198X
Siobhan Bernadette Laura O'ConnellLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3651-1884
Shrinkhala DawadiLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4085-9181
Eden Noah GelgootLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2049-264X
Skye A MinerLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8848-2440
Stephanie RobinsLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6248-9209
Joy SchinaziLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-8631
Phyllis ZelkowitzLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1965-5731
Jewish General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe experience of infertility and its treatment engenders considerable stress and is often described as an emotional rollercoaster. A mobile health (mHealth) app may be a novel solution to address the psychoeducational and psychosocial support needs of fertility patients because of its potential to reduce stress and increase patient empowerment. There are a few fertility-related apps that provide information and support to both men and women undergoing fertility treatment; however, none have documented their development and evaluation process.

objectiveThis study aims to describe the development and evaluation process of a bilingual mHealth app, Infotility, designed to meet the psychoeducational and psychosocial support needs of men and women undergoing fertility treatment.

methodsTo develop the Infotility app, we adhered to the Medical Research Council guidelines for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. First, we conducted literature reviews and needs assessment surveys of fertility patients and health care providers who informed the content and design of the app. Second, we tested the intervention with a small group of end users who provided feedback on the design and appropriateness of the app's content. Third, we evaluated the uptake and usability of the app using a pre-post study design. Finally, we updated the app's content based on participants' feedback and searched for partners to disseminate the app to the broader public.

resultsThis study is the first to describe the development and evaluation process of an mHealth app for men and women undergoing fertility treatment. The app met its goal in providing fertility patients with a clinician-approved, portable resource for reliable information about medical and psychosocial aspects of infertility and its treatments and a confidential peer support forum monitored by trained peer supporters. Participants rated the engagement, functionality, information, and esthetics of the app positively, with an overall app quality mean score of 3.75 (SD 0.53) and a star rating of 3.43 (SD 0.75), with a total possible score and star rating of 5.00.

conclusionsBy documenting the systematic development and evaluation of the mHealth app for men and women undergoing fertility treatment, this paper can facilitate the replication of the study intervention and the development of similar mHealth apps.

Indexed as

infertilityintervention designmHealth appmHealth development processmobile phone

Identifiers

PMID34636741
PMCPMC8548975
OpenAlexW3206016031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.