Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636722›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

mRNA vaccine-induced T cells respond identically to SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern but differ in longevity and homing properties depending on prior infection status.

Jason Neidleman, Xiaoyu Luo, Matthew McGregor, Guorui Xie, Victoria Murray, Warner C Greene, Sulggi A Lee, Nadia R Roan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jason Neidleman *Department or Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Xiaoyu Luo *Gladstone Institute of Virology, San Francisco, United States.
Matthew McGregorDepartment or Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Guorui XieDepartment or Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Victoria MurrayUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Warner C GreeneGladstone Institute of Virology, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-8615
Sulggi A LeeMedicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1560-2250
Nadia R RoanDepartment or Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-1976
University of California, San Francisco · USInstitute of Virology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SK

Funding

Research BaseP30DK063720 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KRUMMEL, MATTHEW F · 2003 to 2019
$21.8M
UCSF DVS CyTOF Mass CytometerS10OD018040 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LANIER, LEWIS LEE · 2014 to 2014
$600k
Fast Grants 2160Fast Grants 2164Fast Grants 2164,2208,2160Fast Grants 2208NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK063720NIH HHS S10 OD018040Sandler Foundation Program for Breakthrough Biomedical Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While mRNA vaccines are proving highly efficacious against SARS-CoV-2, it is important to determine how booster doses and prior infection influence the immune defense they elicit, and whether they protect against variants. Focusing on the T cell response, we conducted a longitudinal study of infection-naïve and COVID-19 convalescent donors before vaccination and after their first and second vaccine doses, using a high-parameter CyTOF analysis to phenotype their SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells. Vaccine-elicited spike-specific T cells responded similarly to stimulation by spike epitopes from the ancestral, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variant strains, both in terms of cell numbers and phenotypes. In infection-naïve individuals, the second dose boosted the quantity and altered the phenotypic properties of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells, while in convalescents the second dose changed neither. Spike-specific T cells from convalescent vaccinees differed strikingly from those of infection-naïve vaccinees, with phenotypic features suggesting superior long-term persistence and ability to home to the respiratory tract including the nasopharynx. These results provide reassurance that vaccine-elicited T cells respond robustly to emerging viral variants, confirm that convalescents may not need a second vaccine dose, and suggest that vaccinated convalescents may have more persistent nasopharynx-homing SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells compared to their infection-naïve counterparts.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunization, SecondaryLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedmRNA VaccinesSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusT-LymphocytesVaccinationVaccines, SyntheticCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, Syntheticantigen-specific T cellsCOVID-19CyTOFhumanimmunologyinfectious diseaseinflammationlymphocyte subsetsmicrobiologymRNA vaccineSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34636722
PMCPMC8545397
OpenAlexW3206651374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.