ArticleNMR in biomedicine2022
A hybrid numeric-analytic solution for pulsed CEST.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Consistency of Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MRI for Brain Tumor Differentiation: Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Pooled it
- Quantitative macromolecular proton fraction imaging using pulsed spin-lock.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Adjustment of rotation and saturation effects (AROSE) for CEST imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Dynamic and rapid deep synthesis of chemical exchange saturation transfer and semisolid magnetization transfer MRI signals.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Mapping pH using stimulated echoes formed via chemical exchange.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) methods measure the effect of magnetization exchange between solutes and water. While CEST methods are often implemented using a train of off-resonant shaped RF pulses, they are typically analyzed as if the irradiation were continuous. This approximation does not account for exchange of rotated magnetization, unique to pulsed irradiation and exploited by chemical exchange rotation transfer methods. In this work, we derive and test an analytic solution for the steady-state water signal under pulsed irradiation by extending a previous work to include the effects of pulse shape. The solution is largely accurate at all offsets, but this accuracy diminishes at higher exchange rates and when applying pulse shapes with large root-mean-squared to mean ratios (such as multi-lobe sinc pulses).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.