ArticleMedical physics2021
Image-based shading correction for narrow-FOV truncated pelvic CBCT with deep convolutional neural networks and transfer learning.
Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- ART workflow based on CBCT and end-to-end clinical dynamic phantom validation.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Restoration of missing regions in limited field of view computer tomography using an image- and sinogram-based conditional generative adversarial network model.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Current status and upcoming developments for online adaptive proton therapy enabling a closed feedback loop for near real-time adaptation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Unsupervised Deep Learning for Synthetic CT Generation from CBCT Images for Proton and Carbon Ion Therapy for Paediatric Patients.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Reproducibility and location-stability of radiomic features derived from cone-beam computed tomography: a phantom study.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Using RegGAN to generate synthetic CT images from CBCT images acquired with different linear accelerators.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Evaluation of generalization ability for deep learning-based auto-segmentation accuracy in limited field of view CBCT of male pelvic region.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Improving CBCT image quality to the CT level using RegGAN in esophageal cancer adaptive radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023Article
- Image-based shading correction for narrow-FOV truncated pelvic CBCT with deep convolutional neural networks and transfer learning.Medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a standard solution for in-room image guidance for radiation therapy. It is used to evaluate and compensate for anatomopathological changes between the dose delivery plan and the fraction delivery day. CBCT is a fast and versatile solution, but it suffers from drawbacks like low contrast and requires proper calibration to derive density values. Although these limitations are even more prominent with in-room customized CBCT systems, strategies based on deep learning have shown potential in improving image quality. As such, this article presents a method based on a convolutional neural network and a novel two-step supervised training based on the transfer learning paradigm for shading correction in CBCT volumes with narrow field of view (FOV) acquired with an ad hoc in-room system.
methodsWe designed a U-Net convolutional neural network, trained on axial slices of corresponding CT/CBCT couples. To improve the generalization capability of the network, we exploited two-stage learning using two distinct data sets. At first, the network weights were trained using synthetic CBCT scans generated from a public data set, and then only the deepest layers of the network were trained again with real-world clinical data to fine-tune the weights. Synthetic data were generated according to real data acquisition parameters. The network takes a single grayscale volume as input and outputs the same volume with corrected shading and improved HU values.
resultsEvaluation was carried out with a leave-one-out cross-validation, computed on 18 unique CT/CBCT pairs from six different patients from a real-world dataset. Comparing original CBCT to CT and improved CBCT to CT, we obtained an average improvement of 6 dB on peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), +2% on structural similarity index measure (SSIM). The median interquartile range (IQR) Hounsfield unit (HU) difference between CBCT and CT improved from 161.37 (162.54) HU to 49.41 (66.70) HU. Region of interest (ROI)-based HU difference was narrowed by 75% in the spongy bone (femoral head), 89% in the bladder, 85% for fat, and 83% for muscle. The improvement in contrast-to-noise ratio for these ROIs was about 67%.
conclusionsWe demonstrated that shading correction obtaining CT-compatible data from narrow-FOV CBCTs acquired with a customized in-room system is possible. Moreover, the transfer learning approach proved particularly beneficial for such a shading correction approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.