Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636429›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Image-based shading correction for narrow-FOV truncated pelvic CBCT with deep convolutional neural networks and transfer learning.

Matteo Rossi, Gabriele Belotti, Chiara Paganelli, Andrea Pella, Amelia Barcellini, Pietro Cerveri, Guido Baroni

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Improving CBCT image quality to the CT level using RegGAN in esophageal cancer adaptive radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo RossiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2519-0720
Gabriele BelottiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Chiara PaganelliDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Andrea PellaBioengineering Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Amelia BarcelliniRadiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Pietro CerveriDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Guido BaroniDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Politecnico di Milano · ITNational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy · IT

Funding

CNAO Foundation (Pavia, Italy) BAA9CONV01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a standard solution for in-room image guidance for radiation therapy. It is used to evaluate and compensate for anatomopathological changes between the dose delivery plan and the fraction delivery day. CBCT is a fast and versatile solution, but it suffers from drawbacks like low contrast and requires proper calibration to derive density values. Although these limitations are even more prominent with in-room customized CBCT systems, strategies based on deep learning have shown potential in improving image quality. As such, this article presents a method based on a convolutional neural network and a novel two-step supervised training based on the transfer learning paradigm for shading correction in CBCT volumes with narrow field of view (FOV) acquired with an ad hoc in-room system.

methodsWe designed a U-Net convolutional neural network, trained on axial slices of corresponding CT/CBCT couples. To improve the generalization capability of the network, we exploited two-stage learning using two distinct data sets. At first, the network weights were trained using synthetic CBCT scans generated from a public data set, and then only the deepest layers of the network were trained again with real-world clinical data to fine-tune the weights. Synthetic data were generated according to real data acquisition parameters. The network takes a single grayscale volume as input and outputs the same volume with corrected shading and improved HU values.

resultsEvaluation was carried out with a leave-one-out cross-validation, computed on 18 unique CT/CBCT pairs from six different patients from a real-world dataset. Comparing original CBCT to CT and improved CBCT to CT, we obtained an average improvement of 6 dB on peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), +2% on structural similarity index measure (SSIM). The median interquartile range (IQR) Hounsfield unit (HU) difference between CBCT and CT improved from 161.37 (162.54) HU to 49.41 (66.70) HU. Region of interest (ROI)-based HU difference was narrowed by 75% in the spongy bone (femoral head), 89% in the bladder, 85% for fat, and 83% for muscle. The improvement in contrast-to-noise ratio for these ROIs was about 67%.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that shading correction obtaining CT-compatible data from narrow-FOV CBCTs acquired with a customized in-room system is possible. Moreover, the transfer learning approach proved particularly beneficial for such a shading correction approach.

Indexed as

Spiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerSignal-To-Noise Ratiocone beam CTdeep learningHounsfield unit recoverylimited FOVshading correctiontransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID34636429
PMCPMC9297981
OpenAlexW3206294837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.