Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636185›Full record

ReviewJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B2021

Current progress of computational modeling for guiding clinical atrial fibrillation ablation.

Zhenghong Wu, Yunlong Liu, Lv Tong, Diandian Dong, Dongdong Deng, Ling Xia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Role of Computational Modelling in Enhancing Thermal Safety During Cardiac Ablation.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhenghong WuCollege of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Yunlong LiuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Lv TongSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Diandian DongSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Dongdong DengSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Ling XiaCollege of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. xialing@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province 2020C03016the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901841 and 61527811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias, associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs, and it places a significant burden on both individuals and society. Anti-arrhythmic drugs are the most commonly used strategy for treating AF. However, drug therapy faces challenges because of its limited efficacy and potential side effects. Catheter ablation is widely used as an alternative treatment for AF. Nevertheless, because the mechanism of AF is not fully understood, the recurrence rate after ablation remains high. In addition, the outcomes of ablation can vary significantly between medical institutions and patients, especially for persistent AF. Therefore, the issue of which ablation strategy is optimal is still far from settled. Computational modeling has the advantages of repeatable operation, low cost, freedom from risk, and complete control, and is a useful tool for not only predicting the results of different ablation strategies on the same model but also finding optimal personalized ablation targets for clinical reference and even guidance. This review summarizes three-dimensional computational modeling simulations of catheter ablation for AF, from the early-stage attempts such as Maze III or circumferential pulmonary vein isolation to the latest advances based on personalized substrate-guided ablation. Finally, we summarize current developments and challenges and provide our perspectives and suggestions for future directions.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationFibrosisHumansMyocardiumAtrial fibrillationAtrial fibrosisCatheter ablationComputational modeling

Identifiers

PMID34636185
PMCPMC8505458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.