Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636183›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology reports2021

Consensus development of priority outcome domains for community mental health cares by multiple stakeholders: Protocol for an online Delphi study in Japan.

Takuma Shiozawa, Sosei Yamaguchi, Makoto Ogawa, Makiko Abe, Takayuki Kawaguchi, Momoka Igarashi, Naonori Yasuma, Chiyo Fujii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Takuma ShiozawaDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9307-576X
Sosei YamaguchiDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0579-4431
Makoto OgawaDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.
Makiko AbeDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki KawaguchiDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.
Momoka IgarashiDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4352-3365
Naonori YasumaDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.
Chiyo FujiiDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of mental Health, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment goals for mental illness have expanded from hospital discharge and improved functioning to employment, living alone, and personal realization. These changes in treatment goals have also influenced mental health research. Recent studies have addressed the development of core outcome sets focusing on clinical aspects of mental illness such as depression and anxiety. However, a well-developed framework of essential outcomes for people with mental illness (service users) who live in the community is lacking. In addition, recent worldwide trends suggest more patient and public involvement and the importance of considering multiple stakeholders' views in the area of mental health research. Purpose of this study is to explore consensus on high-priority outcome domains among multiple stakeholders in community mental healthcare fields in Japan.

methodsA three-step approach to developing an outcome list will be used. First, we developed a long list of outcomes for community mental health through a literature review, focus group interviews with key stakeholders, and online questionnaire surveys of service users and caregivers. Second, the long list was checked and revised in a pilot study. Third, the long list will be shortened to the outcome list through the Delphi methodology with participation from multiple stakeholders. DISCUSSION: Identifying important common outcome domains through collaboration with multiple stakeholders appears to contribute to the development of evidence for community mental health research in Japan. In addition, the study process itself may help promote patient and public involvement in education, practice, and research in the field of community mental health.

Indexed as

Mental HealthConsensus Statements as TopicDelphi TechniqueHumansJapanPilot Projectscommunity mental healthconsensusDelphi methodoutcome domainpatient and public involvementprotocol

Identifiers

PMID34636183
PMCPMC8698667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.