ArticleInternational wound journal2022
Clinical significance of the secondary pedicle amputation of the repair of distal defects with pedicled axial flap.
Article in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- RETRACTION: Clinical Significance of the Secondary Pedicle Amputation of the Repair of Distal Defects With Pedicled Axial Flap.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Design and testing of an optical instrument for skin flap monitoring.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Clinical significance of the secondary pedicle amputation of the repair of distal defects with pedicled axial flap.International wound journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to explore the clinical significance of the secondary pedicle amputation of the repair of distal defects with pedicled axial flap. Five patients who underwent pedicled axial flap transfer to repair a large area of skin and soft tissue defects in our hospital were included in this retrospective study. Detailed information including general data and clinical data, such as preoperative complication, type of primary wound, the distance between the primary wound and the donor site (cm), postoperative complications, and types of axial flap were collected. The patients had good joint movement at 6 months after pedicle amputation. At 48 hours after transplantation, except for the last patient (NO.5), there were no obvious complications such as blood supply disorder, infection, and incision dehiscence of the patients, and the flaps survived well. Just after pedicle amputation, 3 and 6 months after pedicle amputation, the flaps survived well with good local morphology. Forty-eight hours after operation, part of the distal flap in the last patient (NO.5) was necrotic. After 6 months of pedicle amputation, part of the flap was transferred to the distal wound again. At 6 months after pedicle amputation, these patients could accept local scars even though the scar of the last patient was obvious. The secondary pedicle amputation of the repair of distal defects with axial flap could avoid the compression of the vascular pedicle in the subcutaneous tunnel between the donor site and the primary wound, which may ensure the bold supply and increase the survival rate of the flap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.