Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636134›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2022

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related stress experienced by Australian nurses.

Christina Aggar, Christina Samios, Olivia Penman, Nicola Whiteing, Deb Massey, Rae Rafferty, Karen Bowen, Alexandre Stephens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Inhalation ofFrontiers in psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christina AggarSchool of Health & Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0137-7796
Christina SamiosSchool of Health & Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4661-8343
Olivia PenmanSchool of Health & Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0165-8907
Nicola WhiteingSchool of Health & Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6054-5027
Deb MasseySchool of Health & Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0466-1960
Rae RaffertyNorthern New South, Wales Local Health District, Ballina, New South Wales, Australia.
Karen BowenNorthern New South, Wales Local Health District, Ballina, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5840-3820
Alexandre StephensNorthern New South, Wales Local Health District, Ballina, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2465-8117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, the impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers' mental health has been a major focus of recent research. However, Australian research involving nurses, particularly across the acute care sector, is limited. This cross-sectional research aimed to explore the impact of pandemic-related stress on psychological adjustment outcomes and potential protective factors for nurses (n = 767) working in the Australian acute care sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurses completed an online questionnaire with psychometrically validated measures of pandemic-related stress, psychological adjustment outcomes (depression, anxiety, and subjective well-being), and protective factors (posttraumatic growth and self-compassion). Descriptive analyses revealed that pandemic-related stress was reported by 17.7% of the participants. Psychological adjustment outcome scores above normal for depression (27.5%) and anxiety (22.0%) were found, and 36.4% of the participants reported poor subjective well-being. Regression analyses suggest that pandemic-related stress predicted greater depression (B = 0.32, SE = 0.02, 95% confidence interval [0.28, 0.35]) and anxiety (B = 0.26, SE = 0.01, 95% confidence interval [0.24, 0.29]) and less subjective well-being (B = -0.14, SE = 0.01, 95% confidence interval [-0.16, -0.12]). Self-compassion weakened the relationship between pandemic-related stress and greater depression, however, exacerbated the relationship between pandemic-related stress and less subjective well-being. Posttraumatic growth reduced the negative relationship between pandemic-related stress and psychological adjustment outcomes. These findings will inform strategies to facilitate psychological resources that support nurses' psychological adjustment, enabling better pandemic preparedness at both an individual and organizational level.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesAnxietyAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Self-CompassionanxietyCOVID-19depressionnursesposttraumatic growthpsychological

Identifiers

PMID34636134
PMCPMC8653281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.