Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34636108›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Kyla H Thomas, Michael N Dalili, José A López-López, Edna Keeney, David M Phillippo, Marcus R Munafò, Matt Stevenson, Deborah M Caldwell, Nicky J Welton

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. The relationship between smoking cessation and vitamin D.Irish journal of medical science · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Electronic Cigarette Harms: Aggregate Evidence Shows Damage to Biological Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyla H ThomasPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5418-4034
Michael N DaliliPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6687-5374
José A López-LópezPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9655-3616
Edna KeeneyStatistical and Health Economic Modelling, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4763-8891
David M PhillippoPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2672-7841
Marcus R MunafòSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-993X
Matt StevensonHealth Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3099-9877
Deborah M CaldwellPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8014-7480
Nicky J WeltonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2198-3205
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of HealthDepartment of Health 15/58/18Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine how varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes compare with respect to their clinical effectiveness and safety.

methodSystematic reviews and Bayesian network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, in any setting, of varenicline, bupropion, NRT and e-cigarettes (in high, standard and low doses, alone or in combination) in adult smokers and smokeless tobacco users with follow-up duration of 24 weeks or greater (effectiveness) or any duration (safety). Nine databases were searched until 19 February 2019. Primary outcomes were sustained tobacco abstinence and serious adverse events (SAEs). We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and treatment rankings and conducted meta-regression to explore covariates.

resultsWe identified 363 trials for effectiveness and 355 for safety. Most monotherapies and combination therapies were more effective than placebo at helping participants to achieve sustained abstinence; the most effective of these, estimated with some imprecision, were varenicline standard [OR = 2.83, 95% credible interval (CrI) = 2.34-3.39] and varenicline standard + NRT standard (OR = 5.75, 95% CrI = 2.27-14.88). Estimates were higher in smokers receiving counselling than in those without and in studies with higher baseline nicotine dependence scores than in those with lower scores. Varenicline standard + NRT standard showed a high probability of being ranked best or second-best. For safety, only bupropion at standard dose increased the odds of experiencing SAEs compared with placebo (OR = 1.27, 95% CrI = 1.04-1.58), and we found no evidence of effect modification.

conclusionsMost tobacco cessation monotherapies and combination therapies are more effective than placebo at helping participants to achieve sustained abstinence, with varenicline appearing to be most effective based on current evidence. There does not appear to be strong evidence of associations between most tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and adverse events; however, the data are limited and there is a need for improved reporting of safety data.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationTobacco Use CessationAdultBayes TheoremBupropionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTobacco Use Cessation DevicesTreatment OutcomeVareniclineBupropionVareniclineadverse eventsbupropioneffectivenesselectronic cigarettesnetwork meta-analysisnicotine replacement therapysafetysmokingvarenicline

Identifiers

PMID34636108
PMCPMC9293179
OpenAlexW3207173175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.