ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022
Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a critical analysis of 140 patients.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05837182 (The Role of Augmented Fixation Techniques in Fragility Fracture Pelvis), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Role of Augmented Fixation Techniques in Fragility Fracture Pelvis (FFP)
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A systematic review regarding clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of surgical and non-surgical patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2023Pooled it
- Explainable Multimodal Machine Learning Predicts 90-Day Treatment Failure in Older Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Complications and outcomes after operative treatment of low-energy pelvic ring and acetabular fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- [Surgical stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis shows a good age-appropriate result regardless of the surgical procedure].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Acceptable outcomes after anterior subcutaneous pelvic Internal Fixation (INFIX) for Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP) type III in elderly patients: a retrospective study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Preferential sacral fracture sites in fragility fractures of the pelvis type IVb and comparison of internal fixation methods: CT-based morphological mapping and finite element analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- The Impact of CT Imaging on the Diagnosis of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: An Observational Prospective Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- One-year mortality rates of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- Managing delayed union of fragility fractures of the pelvis successfully using romosozumab: A case report.Trauma case reports · 2025Article
- Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring: Analysis of Epidemiology, Treatment Concepts, and Surgical Strategies from the Registry of the German Pelvic Multicenter Study Group.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive screw fixation of the anterior pelvic ring and the distal ilium : Tips and tricks to be successful.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2025Review
- Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation with a 3D robot-assisted image-guided navigation system : Technical solutions.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2025Review
- Fixation of Pubic and Acetabular Pathologic Fracture with Curvafix Nail and Concurrent Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Mortality After Iliosacral Screw Fixation for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Innovative development of robot reduction system in geriatric pelvic fractures: A single-center case series in Beijing, China.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Article
- Lumbopelvic Stabilization with Two Methods of Triangular Osteosynthesis: A Biomechanical Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: short-term outcomes of 42 patients.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a treatment protocol based on conservative therapy for fragility fractures of the pelvis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- TiRobot-Assisted Percutaneous Cannulated Screw Fixation for Elderly Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: A Retrospective Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are a clinical entity with an increasing frequency. Indications for and type of surgical treatment are still a matter of debate. PURPOSE: This retrospective study presents and critically analyses the results of operative treatment of 140 patients with FFP.
settingLevel-I trauma center. MATERIALS AND
methodsDemographic data, comorbidities, FFP-classification, type of surgical stabilization (percutaneous (P-group) versus open procedure (O-group)), length of hospital stay (LoS), general in-hospital complications, surgery-related complications, living environment before admission, mobility and destination at discharge were retracted from the medical and radiographic records. Patients were asked participating in a survey by telephone call about their quality of life. SF-8 Physical Component Score (PCS) and SF-8 Mental Component Score (MCS) were calculated as well as the Parker Mobility Score (PMS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
resultsMean age was 77.4 years and 89.3% of patients were female. 92.1% presented with one comorbidity, 49.3% with two or more comorbidities. Median length of hospital stay was 18 days, postoperative length of hospital stay was 12 days. 99 patients (70.7%) received a percutaneous operative procedure, 41 (29.3%) an open. Patients of the O-group had a significantly longer LoS than patients of the P-group (p = 0.009). There was no in-hospital mortality. There were significantly more surgery-related complications in the O-group (43.9%) than in the P-group (19.2%) (p = 0.006). Patients of the O-group needed more often surgical revisions (29.3%) than patients of the P-group (13.1%) (p = 0.02). Whereas 85.4% of all patients lived at home before admission, only 28.6% returned home at discharge (p < 0.001). The loss of mobility at discharge was not influenced by the FFP-classes (p = 0.47) or type of treatment (p = 0.13). One-year mortality was 9.7%. Mortality was not influenced by the FFP-classes (p = 0.428) or type of treatment (p = 0.831). Median follow-up was 40 months. SF-8 PCS and SF-8 MCS were moderate (32.43 resp. 54.42). PMS was 5 and NRS 4. Follow-up scores were not influenced by FFP-classes or type of treatment.
conclusionPatients with FFP, who were treated operatively, suffered from a high rate of non-lethal general, in-hospital complications. Open surgical procedures induced more surgery-related complications and surgical revisions. Mental and physical follow-up scores are low to moderate. Condition at follow-up is not influenced by FFP-classes or type of treatment. Indications for operative treatment of FFP must be critically examined. Surgical fixation should obtain adequate stability, yet be as less invasive as possible. The advantages and limitations of different surgical techniques have to be critically evaluated in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.