Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34635938›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022

Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a critical analysis of 140 patients.

Pol Maria Rommens, Alexander Hofmann, Sven Kraemer, Miha Kisilak, Mehdi Boudissa, Daniel Wagner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05837182 (The Role of Augmented Fixation Techniques in Fragility Fracture Pelvis), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05837182 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Augmented Fixation Techniques in Fragility Fracture Pelvis (FFP)

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsFragility FractureArmsaugmented fixation techniques
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Mortality After Iliosacral Screw Fixation for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: short-term outcomes of 42 patients.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  19. Evaluation of a treatment protocol based on conservative therapy for fragility fractures of the pelvis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pol Maria RommensDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. prommens@uni-mainz.de.
Alexander HofmannDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Westpfalz Clinics Kaiserslautern, Helmut-Hartert-Strasse 1, 67655, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Sven KraemerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Miha KisilakDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Mehdi BoudissaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel WagnerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEWestpfalz Klinikum · DE

Funding

zimmer biomet IRE 2017-56CH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are a clinical entity with an increasing frequency. Indications for and type of surgical treatment are still a matter of debate. PURPOSE: This retrospective study presents and critically analyses the results of operative treatment of 140 patients with FFP.

settingLevel-I trauma center. MATERIALS AND

methodsDemographic data, comorbidities, FFP-classification, type of surgical stabilization (percutaneous (P-group) versus open procedure (O-group)), length of hospital stay (LoS), general in-hospital complications, surgery-related complications, living environment before admission, mobility and destination at discharge were retracted from the medical and radiographic records. Patients were asked participating in a survey by telephone call about their quality of life. SF-8 Physical Component Score (PCS) and SF-8 Mental Component Score (MCS) were calculated as well as the Parker Mobility Score (PMS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

resultsMean age was 77.4 years and 89.3% of patients were female. 92.1% presented with one comorbidity, 49.3% with two or more comorbidities. Median length of hospital stay was 18 days, postoperative length of hospital stay was 12 days. 99 patients (70.7%) received a percutaneous operative procedure, 41 (29.3%) an open. Patients of the O-group had a significantly longer LoS than patients of the P-group (p = 0.009). There was no in-hospital mortality. There were significantly more surgery-related complications in the O-group (43.9%) than in the P-group (19.2%) (p = 0.006). Patients of the O-group needed more often surgical revisions (29.3%) than patients of the P-group (13.1%) (p = 0.02). Whereas 85.4% of all patients lived at home before admission, only 28.6% returned home at discharge (p < 0.001). The loss of mobility at discharge was not influenced by the FFP-classes (p = 0.47) or type of treatment (p = 0.13). One-year mortality was 9.7%. Mortality was not influenced by the FFP-classes (p = 0.428) or type of treatment (p = 0.831). Median follow-up was 40 months. SF-8 PCS and SF-8 MCS were moderate (32.43 resp. 54.42). PMS was 5 and NRS 4. Follow-up scores were not influenced by FFP-classes or type of treatment.

conclusionPatients with FFP, who were treated operatively, suffered from a high rate of non-lethal general, in-hospital complications. Open surgical procedures induced more surgery-related complications and surgical revisions. Mental and physical follow-up scores are low to moderate. Condition at follow-up is not influenced by FFP-classes or type of treatment. Indications for operative treatment of FFP must be critically examined. Surgical fixation should obtain adequate stability, yet be as less invasive as possible. The advantages and limitations of different surgical techniques have to be critically evaluated in prospective studies.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesQuality of LifeAgedFemaleHumansMalePelvisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplicationsFragility fractureMortalityOpenOperativeOutcomePelvisPercutaneous

Identifiers

PMID34635938
PMCPMC9360165
OpenAlexW3207301885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.